Stress Echocardiography as a Gatekeeper to Donation in Aged
Marginal Donor Hearts: Anatomic and Pathologic Correlations of
Abnormal Stress Echocardiography Results
Ornella Leone, MD,
a
Sonia Gherardi, MD,
b
Luigi Targa, MD,
c
Emilio Pasanisi, MD,
d
Piero Mikus, MD,
e
Piero Tanganelli, MD,
f
Massimo Maccherini, MD,
g
Giorgio Arpesella, MD,
e
Eugenio Picano,
d
and
Tonino Bombardini, MD, PhD
d
Background: Owing to the shortage of donor hearts, the criteria for acceptance have been considerably
expanded. Pharmacologic stress echocardiography is highly accurate in identifying prognostically
significant coronary artery disease, but brain death and catecholamine storm in potential heart
donors may substantially alter the cardiovascular response to stress. This study assessed correlates
of an abnormal resting/stress echocardiography results in potential donors.
Methods: From April 2005 to December 2007, 18 marginal candidate donors (9 men) aged 58 5 years were
initially enrolled. After legal declaration of brain death, all marginal donors underwent bedside
echocardiography, with baseline and (when resting echocardiography was normal) dipyridamole
(0.84 mg/kg in 6 min) or dobutamine (up to 40 g/kg/min) stress echo. Non-eligible hearts (with
abnormal rest or stress echo findings) were excluded and underwent cardioautoptic verification.
Results: Resting echocardiography showed wall motion abnormalities in 5 patients (excluded from
donation). Stress echocardiography was performed in the remaining 13 (dipyridamole in 11;
dobutamine in 2). Results were normal in 7, of which 6 were uneventfully transplanted in marginal
recipients. Results were abnormal in 6, and autoptic verification performed showed coronary artery
disease in 5, and initial cardiomyopathy in 1.
Conclusions: Bedside pharmacologic stress echocardiography can safely be performed in candidate heart donors,
is able to unmask occult coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy, and shows potential to extend
donor criteria in heart transplantation. Further experience with using marginal donors is needed
before exact guidelines can be established. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:1141–9. Copyright © 2009
by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
Heart transplant is a treatment for heart failure that does
not respond to medication, and its efficacy has been
established. Unfortunately, organ donation is a limiting
factor in this life-saving procedure. Selection of the
organs that will be transplanted is based on two factors.
The first is a suitable donor, according to standard
guidelines.
1
For the heart, an additional criterion is age.
This factor is not that important by itself, but it is factor
because of the associated age-dependent risk for asymp-
tomatic coronary artery disease or latent cardiomyopa-
thy.
2
As a result, heart transplant centers have different
age limits; generally, the age threshold is between 50
and 60 years. In some centers, the age limit for the
donor is 55 years, and older donors are accepted in special
cases such as when the recipient’s condition is very poor
and represents an emergency.
3
This prudent approach is
also dictated by prognostic studies showing a 10% reduc-
tion in the 3-year survival rate in patients who receive an
allograft from donors aged older than 50 years.
4
The second factor is a suitable organ: the “coronary
angiography for all” approach in selecting donor hearts
has been abandoned for administrative and logistic
reasons.
5,6
We rely on clinical history, lifestyle, resting
electrocardiography, echocardiography (echo), hemo-
dynamic parameters, and need for inotropic medica-
tion. Functional stress testing of the heart would con-
ceivably provide more robust risk stratification.
Pharmacologic stress echo allows a simultaneous
evaluation of inducible ischemia and contractile reserve
of the left ventricle (LV); therefore, it is able to unmask
From the Departments of
a
Pathology and
e
Surgery and Transplants,
University of Bologna, Bologna;
b
Cardiology Division and
c
Intensive
Care Unit, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena;
d
Institute of Clinical Physiol-
ogy, National Research Council, Pisa; and Departments of
f
Pathology
and
g
Surgery and Transplants, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Submitted Feb 25, 2009; revised May 28, 2009; accepted May 30,
2009.
Reprint requests: Tonino Bombardini, MD, PhD, FESC, Associate
Researcher, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Coun-
cil, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy. Telephone: +39-050-315-2400.
Fax: +39-050-315-2374. E-mail: bombardini@ifc.cnr.it
Copyright © 2009 by the International Society for Heart and Lung
Transplantation. 1053-2498/09/$–see front matter. doi:10.1016/
j.healun.2009.05.029
1141