Vol. 100, No. 3 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME 550 Density dependence in ungulates: a review of causes, and concepts with some clariications r. terry Bowyer*, Vernon C. BleiCh, Kelley m. stewart, JeriCho C. whiting, and KeVin l. monteith R. Terry Bowyer*, Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA Vernon C. Bleich, Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Recovery Program, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 407 W. Line St., Bishop, CA 93514, USA Kelley M. Stewart, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, 1664 N. Virginia St, Mail Stop 186, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA Jericho C. Whiting, Gonzales-Stoller Surveillance, 120 Technology Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA Kevin L. Monteith, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, Dept. 3166, 1000 E. University Ave., University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA (VCB) *Correspondent: bowyterr@isu.edu Understanding population dynamics of ungulates is not conceptually simple, in part, because there are many counterintuitive processes. We attempt to disentangle important concepts, including density dependence, density independence, limitation, regulation, compensatory and additive mortality, and top-down versus bottom-up forcing by examining how those ideas are related to the carrying capacity (K) of the environment. We contend that the K-selected, life-history characteristics of ungulates account for major components of their population dynamics. Those density-dependent attributes of ungulates require different management strategies than for species with attributes that are inluenced primarily by density-independent processes. We offer a conceptual framework to help explain how density-dependent processes can be confused with those that are density-independent. We also discuss why regulation is the correct California Fish and Game 100(3):550-572; 2014