Intravenous Immunoglobulin Reduces Anti-HLA
Alloreactivity and Shortens Waiting Time to Cardiac
Transplantation in Highly Sensitized Left Ventricular
Assist Device Recipients
Ranjit John, MD; Katherine Lietz, MD, PhD; Elizabeth Burke, RN; Jan Ankersmit, MD;
Donna Mancini, MD; Nicole Suciu-Foca, PhD; Niloo Edwards, MD; Eric Rose, MD;
Mehmet Oz, MD; Silviu Itescu, MD
Background—Recipients of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) develop prominent B-cell hyperreactivity. We
investigated the influence of anti-HLA antibodies on waiting time to cardiac transplantation in LVAD recipients and
compared the effects of 2 immunomodulatory regimens on anti-HLA serum reactivity.
Methods and Results—Fifty-five previously nonsensitized LVAD recipients of a TCI device implanted between 1990 and
1996 were studied. Patients with anti-HLA antibodies received monthly courses of either intravenous immunoglobulin
(IVIg) or plasmapheresis, in conjunction with cyclophosphamide. The effects of these regimens on anti-HLA
alloreactivity and waiting time to transplantation were then determined by Kaplan-Meier log-rank statistics, nonpara-
metric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Student’s t test. Prolongation in transplant waiting time was related to serum IgG
anti–HLA class I alloreactivity. Infusion of IVIg (2 g/kg) caused a mean reduction of 33% in anti–HLA class I
alloreactivity within 1 week. Waiting time to transplantation was significantly reduced by IVIg therapy and subsequently
approximated that in nonsensitized patients. Side effects of IVIg (2 g/kg) were minimal and related primarily to immune
complex disease. Although plasmapheresis caused a similar reduction in alloreactivity to IVIg, this effect was achieved
after longer treatment. Moreover, plasmapheresis was associated with an unacceptably high frequency of infectious
complications. In patients resistant to low-dose (2 g/kg) IVIg therapy, high-dose (3 g/kg) IVIg was effective in reducing
alloreactivity but was associated with a high incidence of reversible renal insufficiency.
Conclusions—These results indicate that IVIg is an effective and safe modality for sensitized recipients awaiting cardiac
transplantation, reducing serum anti-HLA alloreactivity and shortening the duration to transplantation. The therapeutic
and safety profile of IVIg would appear to be superior to plasmapheresis. (Circulation. 1999;100[suppl
II]:II-229 –II-235.)
Key Words: antibodies
immune system
transplantation
ventricular assist devices
A
ntibodies in the serum of a cardiac allograft recipient
that are directed against donor HLA class I major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens constitutively
expressed by allograft endothelium portend a significant risk
for early graft failure (ie, within the first 24 to 48 hours) and
poorer patient survival as a result of complement-mediated
humoral rejection.
1–3
Because T lymphocytes constitutively
express MHC class I antigens, the presence of preformed
lymphocytotoxic antibodies, particularly IgG isotype, de-
tected in a routine T-cell cross-match is considered a contra-
indication to solid organ transplantation.
1
To identify patients
at high risk of having a positive donor-specific cross-match,
cardiac transplantation candidates are screened for anti-HLA
antibodies reactive with lymphocytes from a panel of volun-
teers representative of the major HLA allotypes, collectively
referred to as measurements of panel-reactive antibodies
(PRAs). Patients with high PRA levels are considered to be
“sensitized” to various alloantigens and require donor-
specific cross-matches before transplantation.
The proportion of highly sensitized patients on cardiac
transplant waiting lists has been progressively expanding as a
result of both widespread use of left ventricular assist devices
(LVADs) and increasing numbers of patients undergoing
retransplantation. LVAD recipients develop prominent B-cell
activation, as evidenced by heightened production of anti–
HLA class I and II antibodies.
4–6
Although use of leukocyte-
filtered platelets can partially reduce anti–HLA class I anti-
body production,
6
B-cell hyperreactivity associated with
LVAD implantation results from a multifactorial immunolog-
ical dysregulatory process involving heightened T-cell apo-
From the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Silviu Itescu, MD, Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 622 W 168th St, PH 14
W, Room 1485, New York, NY 10032.
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation is available at http://www.circulationaha.org
II-229
by guest on February 21, 2016 http://circ.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from