Large- and small-scale interactions and quenching in an
2
-dynamo
Peter Frick and Rodion Stepanov
Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, 1, Korolev, Perm, 614013, Russia
Dmitry Sokoloff
Department of Physics, Moscow State University, 119899, Moscow, Russia
Received 26 February 2006; revised manuscript received 5 October 2006; published 22 December 2006
The evolution of the large-scale magnetic field in a turbulent flow of conducting fluid is considered in the
framework of a multiscale
2
-dynamo model, which includes the poloidal and the toroidal components for the
large-scale magnetic field and a shell model for the small-scale magnetohydrodynamical turbulence. The
conjugation of the mean-field description for the large-scale field and the shell formalism for the small-scale
turbulence is based on strict conformity to the conservation laws. The model displays a substantial magnetic
contribution to the effect. It was shown that a large-scale magnetic field can be generated by current helicity
even solely. The quenching and the role of the magnetic Prandtl number P
m
are studied. We have deter-
mined the dynamic nature of the saturation mechanism of dynamo action. Any simultaneous cross correlation
of and large-scale magnetic field energy E
B
is negligible, whereas coupling between and E
B
becomes
substantial for moderate time lags. An unexpected result is the behavior of the large-scale magnetic energy with
variation of the magnetic Prandtl number. Diminishing of P
m
does not have an inevitable ill effect on the
magnetic field generation. The most efficient large-scale dynamo operates under relatively low Prandtl
numbers—then the small-scale dynamo is suppressed and the decrease of P
m
can lead even to superequipar-
tition of the large-scale magnetic field i.e., E
B
E
u
. In contrast, the growth of P
m
does not promote the
large-scale magnetic field generation. A growing counteraction of the magnetic effect reduces the level of
mean large-scale magnetic energy at the saturated state.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066310 PACS numbers: 47.27.E-, 52.30.Cv, 95.30.Qd, 91.25.Cw
I. INTRODUCTION
Magnetic fields of celestial bodies are supposed to be gen-
erated by a hydromagnetic dynamo operating in a moving
electrically conductive medium see, e.g. 1. The corre-
sponding flows are characterized by huge values of govern-
ing parameters, so a direct numerical simulation DNS of
the corresponding magnetohydrodynamical MHD problem
with realistic governing parameters becomes impossible
even with modern numerical facilities. Due to rapid progress
of numerical facilities the parameter range accessible for
DNS is becoming increasingly wide. Some high-resolution
simulations of MHD turbulence up to 1024
3
grid points
have been performed 2,3, which allows one to study the
small-scale dynamo processes in detail but does not elimi-
nate the difference of the accessible range from that of the
cosmic media e.g., the magnetic Reynolds number for the
interstellar medium is R
m
=10
6
even if the estimation of mag-
netic field losses is based on ambipolar diffusion. Moreover,
even if a direct numerical simulation is performed, identifi-
cation of the large-scale features comparable with observa-
tional data is a nontrivial task 4.
The theory of astrophysical dynamos was mainly devel-
oped in the framework of the mean-field approach 5. The
mean-field theory is based on the so-called two-scale ap-
proximation, which suggests that the magnetic field consists
of the large-scale field B and the small-scale fluctuations b,
and that the velocity field is represented as the sum of the
mean-field motion V and velocity fluctuations u. Bearing
this in mind some governing equations for large-scale com-
ponents are evaluated. The transport coefficients in the equa-
tions contain some averaged information concerning the
small-scale components parametrized in terms of B and V.
This approach yields various models for large-scale magnetic
fields of particular celestial bodies, such as galaxies, stars,
and planets, which reproduce to some extent the available
phenomenology 6. Various approaches to proper parametri-
zation were suggested see for review 7,8. However, the
mean-field approach seems to be insufficient because it does
not provide an in-depth insight into the evolution of the
small-scale magnetic and velocity fields, which are replaced
by turbulence parametrization.
It is desirable that the simplicity of the mean-field ap-
proach be combined with a relatively simple model of small-
scale MHD turbulence, which nevertheless would provide a
proper description of interactions of the large-scale magnetic
field with the MHD turbulence. This would allow us to avoid
the time and resource consuming calculations involved in
DNS as well as the insecure parametrizations involved in the
mean-field theories.
The shell models were suggested to describe the spectral
energy transfer 9,10. After numerous refinements they be-
came an effective tool for description of the spectral proper-
ties of the small-scale turbulence see for review 11. These
models do not describe the dynamics of turbulent fluctua-
tions b and u in all details, but replace the full system of
governing partial differential equations by some simple ordi-
nary differential equations describing the spectral transfer of
energy and other relevant quantities. The shell models for
MHD turbulence were introduced in 12–14. This approach
reveals many intrinsic features of the small-scale dynamo
action in the fully developed turbulence of conducting fluids
15. It also allows study of a specific case of a rotating
PHYSICAL REVIEW E 74, 066310 2006
1539-3755/2006/746/06631012 ©2006 The American Physical Society 066310-1