Tyrosine Hydroxylase-Based DNA-Vaccination Is Effective Against
Murine Neuroblastoma
H.N. Lode, MD,
1,2
* U. Pertl, MD,
1
R. Xiang, MD, PhD
1
, G. Gaedicke, MD,
2
and
R.A. Reisfeld, PhD
1
Background. The disruption of self-toler-
ance against neuroblastoma is the ultimate goal
of an effective DNA-vaccine. Procedure. Here
we demonstrate the induction of a protective
immunity against syngeneic murine NXS2 neu-
roblastoma in A/J mice, following vaccination
with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) derived anti-
gens. Oral gene delivery was accomplished us-
ing an attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimu-
rium as a carrier harboring vectors encoding for
mTH antigens. Results. Vaccination was effec-
tive in protecting animals from a lethal chal-
lenge with wild-type NXS2 tumor cells. Con-
clusions. These results provide the first
evidence of the TH self antigen being recog-
nized by T-cells and demonstrate that a TH-
based DNA vaccine is a potentially useful im-
munotherapeutic strategy for neuroblastoma.
Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 35:641–646, 2000.
© 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Key words: tyrosine hydroxylase; DNA vaccines; immunotherapy; neuroblastoma
INTRODUCTION
The effective treatment of Stage 4 neuroblastoma is
one of the major challenges in pediatric oncology, since
its outcome remains poor, even after high-dose chemo-
therapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell trans-
plantation. The development of effective alternative
strategies appears to be the only realistic way to further
improve outcome of this neoplasm.
A new era for cancer immunotherapy emerged in the
last decade based on the recognition that some tumors
encode tumor rejection antigens, which are capable of
inducing protective immunity, particularly through the
cellular arm of the immune system where CD8
+
cyto-
toxic T cells (CTL) seem best equipped to recognize
tumor cells as foreign and eradicate them. Several strat-
egies focusing on CD8
+
T cells include tumor cells trans-
duced with cytokine genes, dendritic cells pulsed with
tumor antigens or tumor cells transfected with costimu-
latory molecules to deliver the antigen-specific signal
concomitant with a second costimulatory signal to CD8
+
T cells [1]. In fact, CD8
+
T cells recognize peptides
presented by MHC class I molecules. These peptides are
usually derived from cytosolic proteins, such as tyrosine
hydroxylase, which are degraded in 20S proteasomes and
translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by trans-
porters associated with antigen processing (TAP1 and
TAP2) before they associate into complexes with MHC
Class I molecules [2], which are transported to the cell
membrane and recognized by CD8
+
T cells [3].
DNA vaccines are based on the discovery that immu-
nization with “naked” DNA leads to strong and persistent
cell-mediated and humoral immune responses to antigens
encoded by plasmid DNA [4–6]. The design of DNA
vaccines is highly flexible, as more than one immunogen
can be expressed in a plasmid together with additional
sequences that serve as immunomodulators. Further-
more, outside the inserts the plasmid contains transcrip-
tional control elements for expression of vaccine inserts
in eukaryotic cells [7,8]. The unmethylated CpG motifs
of plasmid DNA provide T-helper immunostimulatory
activity [8] that mobilizes an immune response against
the DNA-expressed immunogen and stimulates mono-
cytes and macrophages to produce such cytokines as
IL12, TNF- and IFN-/ that, in turn, act on NK cells
to induce lytic activity and INF- secretion [9]. Novel
ways of enhancing the efficacy of DNA vaccines include
growing the plasmid encoding DNA in a nonreplicating
strain of Salmonella that can be applied as an oral vac-
cine. Thus, the live, attenuated bacteria transport the
DNA through the gastrointestinal tract and then through
the M cells which cover the Peyer’s patches of the gut.
From there, the attenuated bacteria enter APCs (macro-
phages and DCs), where they die, because of their mu-
tation, liberating multiple copies of the DNA inside the
phagocytes [9–11]. Indeed, attenuated bacteria may pro-
vide a “danger signal” [12,13] and stimulate the innate
1
The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Immunology, La Jolla,
California, USA
2
Charite ´ Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Berlin, Ger-
many
Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: CA42508.
*Correspondence to: Holger N. Lode, M.D., Assistant Professor,
Charite ´ Children’s Hospital, Dept. of Pediatrics, Augustenburgerplatz
1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: holger.lode@charite.de
Medical and Pediatric Oncology 35:641–646 (2000)
© 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.