Fax +41 61 306 12 34
E-Mail karger@karger.ch
www.karger.com
Original Paper
Caries Res 2009;43:261–268
DOI: 10.1159/000217858
CO
2
Laser (10.6 m) Parameters for Caries
Prevention in Dental Enamel
M. Esteves-Oliveira
a, c
D.M. Zezell
d
J. Meister
a
R. Franzen
a
S. Stanzel
b
F. Lampert
a
C.P. Eduardo
c
C. Apel
a
a
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry and
b
Institute of Medical
Statistics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany;
c
Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry,
University of São Paulo, and
d
Centro de Lasers e Aplicações, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares,
São Paulo, Brazil
9 s (2,036 overlapping pulses) increased caries resistance by
up to 81% compared to the control and was even significant-
ly better than fluoride application (25%, p ! 0.0001). Scan-
ning electron microscopy examination did not reveal any
obvious damage caused by the laser irradiation.
Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
The possibility of making dental enamel more resis-
tant to caries attack by irradiation with a CO
2
laser has
been described for all its main wavelengths [Featherstone
et al., 1998]. The 9.6- m wavelength has 10 times higher
absorption in enamel (8,000 cm
–1
) than the 10.6- m
wavelength (825 cm
–1
) and has therefore been considered
the most promising for use in caries prevention [Zuerlein
et al., 1999]. However, the lower absorption of the 10.6-
m wavelength results in a higher penetration depth and
can therefore affect a thicker enamel layer. For this rea-
son, it has been suggested that the caries-preventive effect
obtained with 10.6 m could be longer-lasting [Fox et al.,
1992]. Furthermore, the most recent studies have demon-
strated that the irradiation of dentin with a 9.3- m CO
2
laser failed to show any statistically significant increase
in acid resistance [Le et al., 2008], whereas a continuous-
wave 10.6- m CO
2
laser was able to decrease the acid dis-
solution rate at higher power settings [Featherstone et al.,
2008]. Therefore, it may be possible that the 10.6- m
Key Words
Bovine enamel Caries prevention CO
2
laser
Demineralisation
Abstract
Although CO
2
laser irradiation can decrease enamel demin-
eralisation, it has still not been clarified which laser wave-
length and which irradiation conditions represent the opti-
mum parameters for application as preventive treatment.
The aim of the present explorative study was to find low-
fluence CO
2
laser ( = 10.6 m) parameters resulting in a
maximum caries-preventive effect with the least thermal
damage. Different laser parameters were systematically
evaluated in 3 steps. In the first experiment, 5 fluences of 0.1,
0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 J/cm
2
, combined with high repetition
rates and 10 s pulse duration, were chosen for the experi-
ments. In a second experiment, the influence of different
pulse durations (5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 s) on the demineralisa-
tion of dental enamel was assessed. Finally, 3 different irra-
diation times (2, 5 and 9 s) were tested in a third experiment.
In total, 276 bovine enamel blocks were used for the experi-
ments. An 8-day pH-cycling regime was performed after the
laser treatment. Demineralisation was assessed by lesion
depth measurements with a polarised light microscope, and
morphological changes were assessed with a scanning elec-
tron microscope. Irradiation with 0.3 J/cm
2
, 5 s, 226 Hz for
Received: September 8, 2008
Accepted after revision: February 18, 2009
Published online: May 8, 2009
Dr. Marcella Esteves-Oliveira
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry
RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30
DE–52074 Aachen (Germany)
Tel. +49 241 808 8111, Fax +49 241 808 2468, E-Mail marcella@usp.br
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
0008–6568/09/0434–0261$26.00/0
Accessible online at:
www.karger.com/cre