Ecological eld experiment of short-term effects of shing ban on sh assemblages in a tropical estuarine MPA Jean-Marc Ecoutin a , Monique Simier b, * , Jean-Jacques Albaret a , Raymond La e c , Jean Raffray d , Oumar Sadio e , Luis Tito de Morais d a Institut de Recherches pour le developpement (IRD), UMR LEMAR 195 (Laboratoire des sciences de l'Environnement MARin), Avenue Jean Monnet, CS 30171, 34203 Sete Cedex, France b Institut de Recherches pour le developpement (IRD), UMR EME 212 (Exploited Marine Ecosystem), Avenue Jean Monnet, CS 30171, 34203 Sete Cedex, France c Institut de Recherches pour le developpement (IRD), UMR LEMAR 195 (Laboratoire des sciences de l'Environnement MARin), Bd Sidi Abderrahman Ain Diab, Casablanca, Morocco d Institut de Recherches pour le developpement (IRD), UMR LEMAR 195 (Laboratoire des sciences de l'Environnement MARin), BP 70, 29280 Plouzane, France e Institut de Recherches pour le developpement (IRD), UMR LEMAR 195 (Laboratoire des sciences de l'Environnement MARin), BP 1386, Dakar, Senegal article info Article history: Available online abstract Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), in addition to their important role in the conservation of critical habitats and vulnerable species, are now also used in a context of ecosystem-based sheries management. The aim of this study was to assess the observed changes in the sh population structure in the years following a shing ban. The experiment took place in the Bamboung bolong, a small bay in the Sine Saloum estuary in Senegal, West Africa. The protection of this zone was undertaken with local shermen support, and a formal MPA was created in 2004. The survey of the sh assemblages was initiated in 2003, the year before the shing ban, and went on until 2007, with 12 sampling sites being monitored three times per year. In this paper, we describe and analyze the evolution of the sh assemblage during this ve years' experimental period. Some changes have been highlighted on which the effect of the shing ban was shown. After the shing ban, an increase of total biomass and of maximal sh length has been registered. In the same time, the number of species has increased and the percentage of large and/or iconic species targeted by shing has also increased. The community structure has been modied, with more small sh, more big sh (new large species and more large individuals in the original species) and fewer medium sized sh. The contribution of marine afnity species has increased in depend of the estuarine part of the assemblage. Finally, the trophic structure has been modied with an overall increase of the mean trophic level, resulting from an increase of the percentage of generalist or piscivorous predators and a sharp decrease of herbivorous and detritivorous low trophic level species. Marine predators which numbers and size were reduced by sheries are again important components of the system. We argue that despite the intrinsic variability of the tropical estuarine environments, the introduction of a total ban on shing in such estuarine zones can substantially improve the health status of the sh assemblage. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Faced with widespread over-shing (Pauly and Froese, 2012), partial or complete shing bans were implemented worldwide with the hope of restoring sh stocks (Halpern, 2003; Claudet et al., 2008), and thus more sustainable sheries. According to Roberts and Polunin (1993), the main expected results of Marine Pro- tected Areas (MPAs) were as follows: * Corresponding author. Institut de Recherches pour le developpement (IRD), UMR EME 212 (Exploited Marine Ecosystem), Avenue Jean Monnet, CS 30171 34203, Sete Cedex, France. E-mail addresses: jean-marc.ecoutin@ird.fr (J.-M. Ecoutin), monique.simier@ird. fr (M. Simier), jean-jacques.albaret@ird.fr (J.-J. Albaret), raymond.lae@ird.fr (R. Lae), oumar.sadio@ird.fr (O. Sadio), luis.tito-de-morais@ird.fr (L. Tito de Morais). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean & Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.08.009 0964-5691/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Ocean & Coastal Management 100 (2014) 74e85