[CANCER RESEARCH 64, 2406 –2410, April 1, 2004]
Oncogene Expression and Genetic Background Influence the Frequency of DNA
Copy Number Abnormalities in Mouse Pancreatic Islet Cell Carcinomas
Jeffrey H. Hager,
1
J. Graeme Hodgson,
2,3
Jane Fridlyand,
3
Sujatmi Hariono,
2
Joe W. Gray,
2,3
and Douglas Hanahan
1
Departments of
1
Biochemistry, University of California at San Francisco Diabetes and Comprehensive Cancer Center, and
2
Laboratory Medicine and
3
University of California at
San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Centers, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
ABSTRACT
Quantitative measurements of tumor genome composition show re-
markable heterogeneity in tumors arising from the same anatomical
location and/or histopathological class and stage. The factors that con-
tribute to genomic heterogeneity are not clear, but germ-line allelic var-
iation and timing of initiating oncogenic events are likely candidates. We
investigated these factors by using array comparative genomic hybridiza-
tion to measure genomic aberrations in genetically engineered mouse
models of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma, in which oncogenic transforma-
tion is elicited by the SV40 T antigens expressed under the control of the
rat insulin promoter (RIP-Tag). Two distinct transgenic RIP-Tag lines,
and three polymorphic sublines of one, enabled us to investigate the effects
of genetic background and differing age of oncogene induction. Both
parameters were found to bias the spectrum of genomic copy number
abnormalities. Specifically, the frequency of losing portions of chromo-
somes 9 and 16 was significantly modulated by genetic background, with
the former being lost at highest rates in the FVB/N background and the
latter being lost to greatest extent in both FVB/N and C57Bl/6 tumors
compared with C3HeB/Fe tumors. The frequency of losing a region of
chromosome 6 varied according to the age when tumorigenesis was initi-
ated; loss of chromosome 6 was significantly higher when oncogene ex-
pression was first activated in adulthood. These studies illustrate the
utility of transgenic animal models for investigation of factors influencing
genomic heterogeneity despite the commonalty of target cell type and
initiating oncogene.
INTRODUCTION
Human solid tumors are remarkably heterogeneous in genome
abnormalities (1, 2). Variation in the spectrum of recurrent genomic
abnormalities between tumors arising in different anatomical loca-
tions is not surprising given that different organ microenvironments
likely pose distinct barriers to incipient neoplasias as a consequence of
their particular biological functions and homeostasis. By contrast, the
degree of genomic heterogeneity observed in histologically similar
tumors arising in the same anatomical site is surprising. One inter-
pretation is that ostensibly similar tumors in an organ arise from cells
that subtly differ in maturity, location, or function and, as such, have
distinctive genome-wide expression profiles that are benefited by
distinct genomic alterations. This notion is to some extent supported
by gene expression microarray analyses showing that cancers origi-
nating in the same anatomical site can cluster into distinct groups (3,
4); however, tumors within a distinctive expression cluster can still
show considerable genomic heterogeneity (5). One source of such
heterogeneity may be passage through telomere crisis, which intro-
duces a substantial stochastic component to the genomic aberration
composition (6, 7). In addition, the particular genomic aberrations
selected in tumors of ostensibly similar histological type may also be
influenced by polymorphic variation of modifier genes between indi-
viduals and/or variation between individuals in the timing and type of
carcinogenic insult. Our goal in this study was to test these latter
possibilities. We used the RIP-Tag model of pancreatic islet cell
carcinogenesis (8) because our earlier studies indicated that the com-
position of recurrent aberrations in these tumors was influenced by
genetic background and carcinogen exposure (9).
RIP-Tag mice carry the SV40 early region encoding the large T
(Tag) and small t oncoproteins under the control of the rat insulin gene
regulatory region (RIP; Ref. 8). Tag abrogates the functions of the
retinoblastoma and p53 tumor suppressors (10) in the pancreatic islet
cells, leading to the formation of cell tumors (insulinomas) in
every mouse inheriting the hybrid oncogene. We used two different
RIP-Tag lines in these studies. In one line, designated RIP1-Tag2,
transgene expression begins at about E8.5 in progenitor cells of the
endocrine pancreas and rare cells of the thymus, and expression is
maintained in their descendants thereafter. Mice in this class develop
islet tumors by 10 weeks of age, preceded by neoplastic lesions that
are inferred to be stages on a multistep pathway to solid tumors. In the
other line, designated RIP1-Tag5, the transgene is not expressed
during prenatal pancreatic development or at any time in the thymus.
Rather, Tag expression is sporadically activated in individual islet
cells beginning 9 –11 weeks after birth (11). These delayed onset
RIP-Tag mice develop islet tumors at 20 –22 weeks of age (12).
In the present study, we compared recurrent aberrations in the
delayed onset RIP1-Tag5 model and early onset RIP1-Tag2 model,
both bred into the C3H background, to determine whether the timing
of oncogene activation influences the tumor genome aberration pat-
tern. We also compared three sublines of RIP1-Tag2, inbred into three
different genetic backgrounds, C57Bl/6 (B6), C3Heb/Fe (C3H), and
FVB/N (FVB), to determine whether genetic background influences
the tumor genotype.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mouse Genetics. The RIP1-Tag2;C57B6/J and RIP1Tag2C3HeFeb/J were
derived from the same founder animal and subsequently backcrossed to either
C57B6 or C3HeFeb/J for 40 generations (n 40). The RIP1Tag2;FVB/N
line was derived by backcrossing the RIP1-Tag2;C57B6/J line (n 40) to
FVBN/J mice for three generations (N3). The RIP1-Tag5 line harbors the same
transgene as that of the RIP1-Tag2 lines but was derived independently via
injection of C3HebFe/J embryos; the founder animal was bred and line
subsequently maintained in the C3HebFe/J strain background.
Histology. Pancreases were removed and fixed overnight in zinc-buffered
formalin. Fixed tissue was rinsed in 1 PBS, subsequently dehydrated in 35,
50, and 70% ethanol, and embedded in paraffin using a Leica TP1050 tissue
processor. Sections (5 M) were deparrafinized in xylene and rehydrated in
100, 95, 70, and 50% ethanol and 1 PBS. H&E staining of sections was
carried out using standard reagents (Surgipath) and protocols.
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH). Array CGH was
performed as described (14) Gained and deleted clones were identified in each
tumor as those with fluorescence ratios above and below the tumor-specific
threshold (see Supplemental Information for additional details). For compari-
Received 11/10/03; revised 12/23/03; accepted 1/26/04.
Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants (J. W. Gray and D. Hanahan). J. G.
Hodgson was supported by a grant from United States Department of Defense Breast
Cancer Research Program.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with
18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Note: J. H. Hager and J. G. Hodgson contributed equally to this work.
Requests for reprints: Douglas Hanahan, Department of Biochemistry, University of
California at San Francisco Diabetes and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143. Phone: (415) 476-9209; E-mail:
dh@biochem.ucsf.edu.
2406
Research.
on January 2, 2016. © 2004 American Association for Cancer cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from