International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1383 – 1391 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhydene Semi-continuous solid substrate anaerobic reactors for H 2 production from organic waste: Mesophilic versus thermophilic regime IdaniaValdez-Vazquez a , Elvira Ríos-Leal a , Fernando Esparza-García a , Franco Cecchi b , Héctor M. Poggi-Varaldo a , ∗ a CINVESTAV-IPN, Department Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Environmental Biotechnology R&D Group, P.O. Box 14-740, Mexico D.F. 07000, Mexico b Universitá degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy Available online 8 December 2004 Abstract We evaluated the influence of the operation temperature (mesophilic vs. thermophilic regime) of semicontinuous, acidogenic solid substrate anaerobic digestion (A-SSAD) of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) at lab scale. The H 2 percentage was higher in the thermophilic regime than in the mesophilic operation (58% and 42%, respectively). The H 2 yield of thermophilic A-SSAD was significantly higher than in our mesophilic reactors (360 vs. 165 NmL H 2 /g VS rem ) and other studies reported in the literature (range of 62–180 mL/g VS). Mesophilic A-SSAD showed a yield of 37% of the maximum yield based on 4 mol H 2 /mol hexose, while thermophilic A-SSAD exhibited a yield of 80% of the maximum yield. This result is similar to works with pure cultures of extremophile microorganisms where H 2 yields of 83% of the maximum were reported. We found higher concentrations of acetic acid in the digestates of thermophilic A-SSAD, while butyrate was in higher proportion in mesophilic A-SSAD spent solids. The moderate-to-high yields obtained with the semicontinuous process used in this work are in disagreement with previous reports claiming that batch and semicontinuous processes are less efficient than continuous ones. 2004 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Acidogenic fermentation; Biological hydrogen production; Organic wastes; Semi-continuous; Temperature 1. Introduction During the past 10 years there has been a renewed interest in new technologies that could supply energy in an environmentally friendly, sustainable way [1]. From an environmental viewpoint, there is an urgent need for ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +52 555061 3800x4324; fax: +52 55 5061 7002. E-mail addresses: valdez_idania@yahoo.com (I. Valdez-Vazquez), hectorpoggi2001@yahoo.com (H.M. Poggi-Varaldo). 0360-3199/$30.00 2004 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.09.016 appropriate management of municipal solid wastes (MSW). Nearly 1600 million tonne/year of MSW are generated worldwide with up to 43% contributed by Asia and Oceania and 28% contributed by North America and the European Union [2]. On average, almost 50% of the MSW of underde- veloped countries consists of a fermentable, biodegradable fraction. The anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of mu- nicipal solid waste (OFMSW) for generation of methane and a soil amender has received increased interest in the last 15 years [3–9]. Yet, even the use of methane as a fuel could be debatable, due to the production of CO 2 known to