EARLY GROWTH, ADULT BODY SIZE AND PROSTATE CANCER RISK
Graham G. GILES
1
*
, Gianluca SEVERI
2
, Dallas R. ENGLISH
1,5
, Margaret R.E. MCCREDIE
3,4
, Robert MACINNIS
1
, Peter BOYLE
2
and
John L. HOPPER
6
1
Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
3
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin Medical School, University of Otago, New Zealand
4
Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, New South Wales Cancer Council, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
5
Department of Public Health, University Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
6
Centre for Genetic Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
The role of growth from birth through puberty and
through adult life has been the subject of epidemiologic in-
vestigation in regard to the risk of prostate cancer but the
evidence remains weak and inconsistent. We investigated
associations between prostate cancer risk and a number of
markers of body growth, size and changes to size in a popu-
lation-based, case-control study in Australia from 1994 to
1998. We analyzed data obtained in face-to-face interviews
from 1,476 cases and 1,409 controls. The main outcomes of
interest were the timing of the growth spurt in adolescence,
the experience of acne and interviewer observation of facial
acne scarring, body size at age 21, body size in reference
year, maximum body weight and rate of body size change
since age 21 years. Analysis was performed on all cases and
also by tumour grade. We found no associations with mea-
sures of body size including body mass index and lean body
mass at age 21 or later in adult life. Having a growth spurt
later than friends reduced risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.79 [0.63–
0.97]) and some measures of acne also gave odds ratios less
than 1, for example, having facial acne scarring gave an OR of
0.67 (0.45–1.00). We conclude that markers of delayed an-
drogen action, such as delayed growth spurt in puberty, and
markers of other androgen-dependent activity in puberty,
such as facial acne scarring, are associated with prostate
cancer risk but we could detect no associations with markers
of adult body size and growth including lean body mass.
© 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Key words: prostate cancer; anthropometry; growth
Although prostate cancer (PCa) is a disease of older men, early
physical growth and development might be important in influenc-
ing PCa risks that will only be manifested many years later.
1
Measures of body mass in adult life might also be associated with
PCa risk, but a recent review described the evidence relating
various body dimensions such as height and body mass index
(BMI) to PCa risk as weak and inconsistent.
2
One contributory
factor to this inconsistency is the wide variation in quality of
studies, particularly in regard to their statistical power—the liter-
ature is replete with many small case-control studies that have also
depended on self-reported estimates of body dimensions.
3
Another
factor affecting consistency of findings is poor disease specificity,
since most epidemiologic studies accept all PCa as one biologic
entity when it is probable that PCa is biologically heterogeneous
not only in terms of grade and stage but also with respect to its
clinical behaviour.
4
The use of BMI as a measure of obesity also
presents difficulties as BMI does not differentiate between lean
mass and fat mass
2,5
but at certain ages may be more closely
associated with lean mass, e.g., during adolescence. As lean body
mass (LBM) is associated with androgen and other growth-factor
activity
6,7
and fat mass (FM) is associated with increased oestro-
genic activity,
8
these 2 elements of body mass are likely to have
different associations with a hormone-dependent malignancy such
as PCa. BMI also combines height and weight, each of which has
separate determinants.
We conducted a large case-control study of PCa to see if we
could detect any associations with markers of early growth and
adult body size, particularly with respect to relatively early age at
onset (70 years of age) and tumours of moderate to high grade.
We hypothesised, reasoning by analogy with menarche and breast
cancer, that early andrarche would be positively associated with
PCa risk and late andrarche with reduced risk; the former being
related to high and the latter with low androgen activity. We also
hypothesised that LBM would be positively associated with PCa
risk because of the known dependency of both LBM and PCa on
androgens and other growth factors.
6,7
Similarly, we hypothesised
that FM would be negatively associated with PCa risk because of
the likely increased production of oestrogens by peripheral aroma-
tisation in adipose tissue
8
and a possible protective effect of a
consequently increased ratio of oestrogens to androgens.
9
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We carried out a population-based, case-control study of PCa in
Melbourne, Sydney and Perth, Australia, details of which have
been published before.
10
Subjects were usual residents of the 3
cities’ metropolitan areas. The study protocol was approved by all
relevant human research ethics committees in Victoria, New South
Wales and Western Australia. Eligible cases comprised all male
residents of Melbourne, Sydney and Perth diagnosed from 1994 to
1997 and notified to the population-based cancer registries with a
histopathology-confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the
prostate (International Classification of Diseases 9th revision ru-
bric 185), excluding well-differentiated tumours (defined as low
grade, i.e., those with Gleason scores 5). Cases had to be aged
70 years at diagnosis and registered on the State Electoral Rolls
(adult registration to vote is compulsory in Australia). All cases
diagnosed before the age of 60 years were included. Initially,
random samples of 50% of cases diagnosed aged 60 – 64 and 25%
of cases diagnosed aged 65– 69 were selected, with the proportions
varying over time to fit interview quotas.
Controls were randomly selected from men on the current State
Electoral Rolls and were frequency matched to the age distribution
of the cases in a ratio of 1 control per case. Potential controls were
matched against the cancer registries at the time of recruitment to
exclude men with a known history of PCa. Three controls were
Grant sponsor: National Health and Medical Research Council; Grant
number: 940394; Grant sponsor: Tattersall’s; Grant sponsor: The Whitten
Foundation; Grant sponsor: The Cancer Council Victoria.
*Correspondence to: Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer
Council Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton South, Australia 3053.
Fax: +61-3-9635-5330. E-mail: Graham.Giles@cancervic.org.au
Received 22 May 2002; Revised 17 June 2002; Accepted 25 August
2002
DOI 10.1002/ijc.10810
Int. J. Cancer: 103, 241–245 (2003)
© 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Publication of the International Union Against Cancer