Do Male Lymphoma Survivors Have Impaired
Sexual Function?
Cecilie E. Kiserud, Leslie R. Schover, Alv A. Dahl, Alexander Fosså, Trine Bjøro, Jon Håvard Loge,
Harald Holte, Ying Yuan, and Sophie D. Fosså
From the Departments of Clinical
Cancer Research, Oncology, and Labo-
ratory Medicine, Norwegian Radium
Hospital, Oslo University Hospital;
Faculty Division of Norwegian Radium
Hospital and Faculty Division of
Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo;
Faculty of Medicine, The National
University for Science and Technology,
Trondheim, Norway; and Departments
of Behavioral Science and Biostatistics,
The University of Texas M. D. Ander-
son Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Submitted April 16, 2009; accepted
June 24, 2009; published online ahead
of print at www.jco.org on October 26,
2009.
Supported by EXTRA funds from the
Norwegian Foundation for Health and
Rehabilitation, The Norwegian Cancer
Society, The Norwegian Research
Council (Leiv Erikssons Mobility
Program), and Fulbright Norway.
Authors’ disclosures of potential con-
flicts of interest and author contribu-
tions are found at the end of this
article.
Corresponding author: Cecilie E.
Kiserud, MD, Department of Clinical
Cancer Research, The Norwegian
Radium Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway;
e-mail: cecilie.essholt.kiserud@
radiumhospitalet.no.
The Acknowledgment is included in
the full-text version of this article,
available online at www.jco.org.
It is not included in the PDF version
(via Adobe® Reader®).
© 2009 by American Society of Clinical
Oncology
0732-183X/09/2735-6019/$20.00
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2280
A B S T R A C T
Purpose
Sexual function in male lymphoma survivors was examined and compared with that of age-
matched controls.
Patients and Methods
This cross-sectional study included serum gonadal hormone levels (testosterone, sex hormone–
binding globulin, luteinizing hormone [LH], and follicle-stimulating hormone) and responses to
questionnaires assessing sexual function (Brief Sexual Function Inventory [BSFI]), socioeconomic
factors, quality of life, emotional distress, and fatigue. The lymphoma group included 246 men
50 years old at diagnosis who were diagnosed from 1980 to 2002 and treated at the Norwegian
Radium Hospital. For each lymphoma survivor, two age-matched controls (n = 492) were drawn
from a normative sample with BSFI scores.
Results
The lymphoma survivors had a mean age at survey of 47.4 years, the mean duration of follow-up
was 14.8 years, and 79% lived in committed relationships. All BSFI domain scores decreased
significantly with age. Lymphoma survivors having low testosterone and/or elevated LH had lower
BSFI scores than survivors with normal gonadal hormones. Multivariate analyses showed that
increasing age, more emotional distress, poor physical health, and low testosterone and/or
elevated LH were significantly associated with reduced sexual function within the lymphoma
group. Lymphoma survivors had significantly lower BSFI domain scores than did controls on
erection, ejaculation, and sexual satisfaction.
Conclusion
Lymphoma survivors had significantly poorer sexual function than normative controls. It is unclear
whether the abnormal hormone levels directly cause the reduced sexual function within the lymphoma
group or if a mediating factor is involved, such as aging, emotional distress, or perceived health status.
J Clin Oncol 27:6019-6026. © 2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
INTRODUCTION
The sexual functioning of male lymphoma survivors
has rarely been studied, in contrast to a more exten-
sive literature about sexuality after treatment for tes-
ticular or prostate cancer.
1-3
However, a few reports
have been published.
4-8
In a survey of 459 Hodgkin’s
lymphoma (HL) survivors, transient or long-term
reduction of sexual interest and activity was re-
ported by 28%.
4
Similarly, in another study, 24%
reported at least one sexual problem.
8
Sexual inter-
est and sexual activity had decreased compared with
before treatment in approximately 20% of men a
median of 9 years after treatment for HL.
6
In a study
comparing male lymphoma and testicular cancer
survivors, approximately 30% of both groups re-
ported reduced sexual functions within one or more
domains.
7
When using a standard questionnaire on
erectile function, however, 36 (61%) of 59 lym-
phoma survivors age 18 to 55 years reported reduced
erectile function.
5
Thus, the prevalence of self-
reported reduced sexual function may be higher
when more detailed questionnaires are used.
Both chemotherapy and radiotherapy can dam-
age Leydig cell and/or pituitary function,
9-11
result-
ing in subnormal testosterone levels that could
potentially lead to sexual problems.
12
In a follow-up
survey of 294 male lymphoma survivors, 30% had
low testosterone and/or elevated luteinizing hor-
mone (LH).
13
Variations in sex hormones, patient
factors, duration of follow-up, and assessment
methodology make it difficult to compare findings
on sexual function from these studies. More data are
needed to clarify the causes and prevalence of im-
paired sexual function in male lymphoma survivors.
Such studies must also take into account the high
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
O R I G I N A L R E P O R T
VOLUME 27 NUMBER 35 DECEMBER 10 2009
© 2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 6019
Downloaded from jco.ascopubs.org on May 11, 2011. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.