PHARMACOGENETICS AND
GENOMICS
Carbamazepine regulates intestinal
P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance
protein MRP2 and influences disposition of
talinolol in humans
Background and Methods: The antiepileptic drug carbamazepine is known to be an inducer of cytochrome
P450 (CYP) 3A4 after binding to the nuclear pregnane X receptor. To evaluate whether it also regulates the
multidrug transporter proteins P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug resistance protein MRP2 in humans,
duodenal expression of multidrug resistance gene MDR1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and MRP2
mRNA, content of P-gp and MRP2, and disposition of the nonmetabolized P-gp substrate talinolol after
intravenous (30 mg) and long-term oral administration (100 mg for 19 days) were assessed in 7 healthy
subjects (age, 23-35 years; body weight, 64-93 kg) before and after comedication of carbamazepine (600 mg
for 14-18 days).
Results: Carbamazepine medication was associated with increased urinary excretion of D-glucaric acid and
induction of carbamazepine elimination. Creatinine clearance was not affected. Duodenal expression of both
MDR1 mRNA and MRP2 mRNA and the MPR2 protein was significantly induced, whereas the P-gp content
was not affected. MDR1 mRNA expression and MPR2 mRNA expression were correlated (r 0.873, P <
.001). After carbamazepine, metabolic clearance of intravenous talinolol was significantly increased. Residual
clearance was significantly decreased in dependence on MDR1 mRNA expression (r 0.647, P .012) and
MRP2 mRNA expression (r 0.613, P .020). Oral absorption of talinolol was significantly lower after
carbamazepine comedication (53.2% 15.5% versus 62.1% 13.0%, P .018), and renal clearance and
metabolic clearance were significantly increased, correlated in each case with MDR1 mRNA (r 0.612, P
.020, and r 0.554, P .040, respectively) and MRP2 mRNA (r 0.596, P .025, and r 0.565, P
.035, respectively).
Conclusions: Aside from induction of CYP3A4, carbamazepine acts as an inducer of intestinal MDR1 mRNA,
MRP2 mRNA, and MRP2 protein content. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;76:192-200.)
Thomas Giessmann, MD, Karen May, MSc, Christiane Modess, MD, Danilo Wegner,
Ute Hecker, MD, Michael Zschiesche, PhD, Peter Dazert, MSc, Markus Grube, MSc,
Eike Schroeder, PhD, Rolf Warzok, MD, Ingolf Cascorbi, MD, PhD,
Heyo K. Kroemer, PhD, and Werner Siegmund, MD Greifswald, Germany
From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacology,
Peter Holtz Research Center of Pharmacology and Experimental
Therapeutics, and Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathol-
ogy, University of Greifswald.
This work was supported by institutional grants of the Arzneimittel-
werk Dresden GmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Edu-
cation and Research (grant 01 GG 9845/5, 01 ZZ 0103).
Received for publication Oct 9, 2003; accepted April 16, 2004.
Reprint requests: Werner Siegmund, MD, Department of Clinical
Pharmacology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Friedrich-Loeffler-
Strasse 23d, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany.
E-mail: siegmuw@uni-greifswald.de
0009-9236/$30.00
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology
and Therapeutics.
doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2004.04.011
192