Fax +41 61 306 12 34
E-Mail karger@karger.ch
www.karger.com
Behavioural Science Section / Original Paper
Gerontology 2010;56:421–429
DOI: 10.1159/000237875
Proactive and Coactive Interference
in Age-Related Performance in a
Recognition-Based Operation Span Task
Melanie Zeintl Matthias Kliegel
Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Working memory has been defined as a central cogni-
tive resource that needs to be available to store new infor-
mation and simultaneously perform on-line mental op-
erations [1]. Since the concurrent storing and processing
of information is necessary for the majority of complex
cognitive activities in everyday life, working memory
represents a key cognitive resource for many aspects of
everyday cognitive functioning [2, 3]. According to Engle
et al. [4], working memory can be understood as a capac-
ity for controlled and sustained attention in the face of
interference or distraction. In their view, working mem-
ory capacity consists of a memory-free attentional con-
trol system and a general short-term memory component
that uses various domain-specific codes.
The proposed function of working memory is best
captured by complex span tasks (e.g. operation span,
reading span, or counting span) that have been applied in
numerous studies to measure working memory perfor-
mance [5]. Usually, complex span tasks are dual tasks
with alternating presentations of a recall and a processing
task. Thus, working memory span tests generally consist
of a storing and a processing component. For instance,
the operation span task [6] requires solving simple math
problems and concurrently memorizing additionally pre-
sented words. From the large body of research on working
memory span tasks, Conway et al. [5] conclude that these
tasks are characterized by adequate reliability as well as
substantial construct validity as they are able to predict
performance in an ample variety of tasks requiring atten-
Key Words
Working memory Inhibitory control Recognition
Abstract
Background: Generally, older adults perform worse than
younger adults in complex working memory span tasks. So
far, it is unclear which processes mainly contribute to age-
related differences in working memory span. Objective: The
aim of the present study was to investigate age effects and
the roles of proactive and coactive interference in a recogni-
tion-based version of the operation span task. Methods:
Younger and older adults performed standard versions and
distracter versions of the operation span task. At retrieval,
participants had to recognize target words in word lists con-
taining targets as well as proactive and/or coactive inter-
ference-related lures. Results: Results show that, overall,
younger adults outperformed older adults in the recogni-
tion of target words. Furthermore, analyses of error types
indicate that, while younger adults were only affected by si-
multaneously presented distracter words, older adults had
difficulties with both proactive and coactive interference.
Conclusion: Results suggest that age effects in complex
span tasks may not be mainly due to retrieval deficits in old
age. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Received: September 25, 2008
Accepted: March 16, 2009
Published online: September 10, 2009
Melanie Zeintl
Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden
Zellescher Weg 17, DE–01062 Dresden (Germany)
Tel. +49 351 463 39192, Fax +49 351 463 37294
E-Mail zeintl@psychologie.tu-dresden.de
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
0304–324X/10/0564–0421$26.00/0
Accessible online at:
www.karger.com/ger
Downloaded by:
Université de Genève
192.33.214.33 - 8/12/2013 3:30:18 PM