Review A critical assessment of in vitro tissue models for ADME and drug delivery Kati-Sisko Vellonen b , Melina Malinen a , Eliisa Mannermaa c , Astrid Subrizi a , Elisa Toropainen c , Yan-Ru Lou a , Heidi Kidron a , Marjo Yliperttula a , Arto Urtti a,b, ⁎ a Centre for Drug Research, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland b School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland c Department of Ophthalmology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland abstract article info Article history: Received 31 March 2014 Accepted 23 June 2014 Available online 30 June 2014 Keywords: Cell model RPE Epidermis Hepatocyte Corneal epithelium In vitro in vivo correlation Cultured cells are widely used in the evaluation of new drugs and drug delivery systems. Cells can be grown at different levels of complexity ranging from simple reductionist models to complex organotypic models. The models are based on primary, secondary or stem cell derived cell cultures. Generation of tissue mimics with cultured cells is a difficult task, because the tissues have well-defined morphology, complex protein expression patterns and multiple inter-linked functions. Development of organotypic cell culture models requires proper biomaterial matrix and cell culture protocols that are able to guide the cells to the correct phenotype. This review illustrates the critical features of the cell culture models and, then, selected models are discussed in more detail (epidermal, corneal epithelial, retinal pigment epithelium, and hepatocyte models). The cell models are critically evaluated paying attention to the level of characterization and reliability of in vivo translation. Properties of the cell models must be characterized in detail using multiple biological assays and broad sets of model drugs. Robust in vivo predictions can be achieved with well-characterized cell models that are used in combination with computational methods that will bridge the gap between in vitro cell experiments and physiological situation in vivo in the body. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 2. Cell sources and modifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 2.1. Primary cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 2.2. Secondary cell lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 2.3. Stem cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 2.4. Reductionist experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 2.5. Complex experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 3. In vivo relevance of the cell models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 3.1. Physical barrier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 3.2. Hydrodynamic diffusion layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 3.3. Role of transporters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 3.4. Role of enzymes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 3.5. In vivo relevance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4. Examples of cell culture models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1. Corneal epithelium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1.1. Drug absorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1.2. Corneal barrier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1.3. Permeability and transport studies. In vivo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1.4. Ex vivo tissue models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1.5. In vitro cell culture models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.1.6. In vivo translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 4.1.7. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Journal of Controlled Release 190 (2014) 94–114 ⁎ Corresponding author. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.044 0168-3659/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Controlled Release journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jconrel