167 Lynx, n. s. (Praha), 41: 167–173 (2010). ISSN 0024-7774 (print), 1804-6460 (online) Inuence of some methodological modications on trapping efciency and mortality of small terrestrial mammals (Rodentia) Vplyv niektorých metodických modikácií na efektivitu odchytu a mortalitu drobných zemných cicavcov (Rodentia) Peter LEŠO & Rudolf KROPIL Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Technical University in Zvolen, Faculty of Forestry, T. G. Masaryka 20, SK–960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; leso@vsld.tuzvo.sk, kropil@vsld.tuzvo.sk received on 15 June 2010 Abstract. Live trapping of small terrestrial mammals was carried out in a mature r-beech forest. Inuence of trap type, bait type and frequency of checks on trapping effectiveness and mortality was examined. Two dominant rodent species Apodemus avicollis and Myodes glareolus were used as model animals. The mean effectiveness of the Chmela-type live traps reached 37.27%. On the contrary, the effectiveness of pitfalls was only 0.56%. An extremely low number of shrews was captured using both trap types. Trap- ping efciency was similar for dry cat food and rolled oats, regardless of the rodent species. Apodemus avicollis showed a signicant difference in trapping frequency between day and night. The activity of Myodes glareolus was more even. Both species showed a higher mean number of individuals captured from sunset to midnight than from midnight to sunrise. Mortality of the model species was 5–17 times lower when carrying out four checks per day in comparison to the standard number of two checks. Key words. Live traps, pitfall traps, trapping efciency, bait, time activity, mortality, Apodemus avicollis, Myodes glareolus. INTRODUCTION The study of small mammal assemblages requires trapping data. The effort to obtain these data is complicated by differences in body size and microhabitat use among species, which can affect species- and trap-type-specic probabilities of captures (MCCAY et al. 1998, WHITTAKER & FEL- DHAMER 2000). Many studies have showed that different trap types show different effectiveness in capturing a particular species or group of species (WIENER & SMITH 1972, PELIKÁN et al. 1977, SLADE et al. 1993, WOODMAN et al. 1996, WHITTAKER et al. 1998, STANKO et al. 1999). The capture probability of different species may also be inuenced by choice of the bait used for trapping (BEER 1964, LAURANCE 1992, WILLAN 1986, WOODMAN et al. 1996) and by the trapping design (PELIKÁN et al. 1975, ZUKAL & GAISLER 1992, MCCAY et al. 1998). In the present study, we tested two types of live traps, two types of bait and capability in different times of day. The inuence of doubled trap checks was also discussed in relation to mortality and calculated density.