Superfluid turbulence in rotating containers: Phenomenological description of the influence of the wall M. S. Mongiovì 1 and D. Jou 2 1 Dipartimento di Metodi e Modelli Matematici, Università di Palermo, c/o Facoltà di Ingegneria, Viale delle Scienze, 90128, Palermo, Italy 2 Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain Received 22 February 2005; revised manuscript received 21 June 2005; published 23 September 2005 In this paper a previous equation for the evolution of vortex line density L in counterflow superfluid turbulence in rotating containers is generalized, in order to take into account the influence of the walls. This model incorporates the effects of counterflow velocity V and of angular velocity of the container, and introduces corrective terms depending on / d, being the intervortex spacing, of the order L -1/2 , and d the diameter of the channel. The stability of the solutions for L, for several regimes of averaged counterflow velocity V and angular velocity , is analyzed. Our mathematical analysis reveals that qualitative consistency allows us to reduce the four coefficients characterizing the dependence on / d to only one additional indepen- dent coefficient, linked to the critical angular velocity c needed for the appearance of vortex lines in a rotating superfluid. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.104515 PACS numbers: 67.40.Vs, 47.37.+q, 47.27.-i, 05.70.Ln I. INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been growing interest in super- fluid turbulence, 1–3 because of its similarity with classical turbulence. 4,5 Among the aspects receiving much attention, there are the effects of the walls as, for instance, on boundary layers. Besides its theoretical interest, the influence of walls on superfluid turbulence may have a practical incidence in refrigeration of small devices by means of flow of superfluid helium along narrow tubes: when the tubes become nar- rower, the relevance of wall effects will increase. In the analysis we will perform, and following previous literature on this problem, we emphasize the spatial average of the heat flux, rather than its detailed local features. Superfluid turbulence has been much studied in two physical situations: counterflow experiments and rotating containers. As is known, thermal counterflow induces a quasi-isotropic disordered tangle, while rotation creates an ordered polarized vortex array. In both cases the vortex tangle is described by introducing a scalar quantity L, the average vortex line length per unit volume, briefly called the vortex line density. In pure rotation, the vortex lines are aligned along the rotation axis, and L depends on the angular velocity of the sample as 6 L = L R 2 , 1.1 where is the quantum of vorticity = h / m, with h the Planck constant, and m the mass of the helium atom: 9.97 10 -4 cm 2 /s. In counterflow experiments, there is a disordered tangle of vortex lines, with a line density L in fully developed turbulencegiven by 6 L = L H AV 2 , 1.2 where V = |V| is the modulus of the spatial average of the counterflow velocity V = v n - v s , v n and v s being the veloci- ties of normal and superfluid components, respectively. This averaged quantity is related to the absolute value of the heat flux by q = TSV, q, , T, and S being, respectively, the heat flux, density, temperature, and entropy of liquid helium II. Here, following most of the references on this topic, we con- sider V as homogeneous; one may consider it as an average value of V over the cross section of the tube. This is so, because this average value is the easiest one to measure. Note that in our analysis for slow rotation the wall effects are not restricted to a narrow zone near the walls but they have an effect over the whole cross section, because in this case the average separation between vortices, L -1/2 , is comparable to the diameter of the channel. Then, it is compatible, in this situation, to talk about wall effects and consider a homoge- neous counterflow velocity across the channel. The evolution of L in superfluid counterflow turbulence is described by Vinen’s equation, 7 which, in its original form, states that dL dt = 1 VL 3/2 - L 2 , 1.3 with 1 and dimensionless constants. The steady-state so- lution of Eq. 1.3is L H = 1 / 2 V 2 , which has the form mentioned in Eq. 1.2. A microscopic derivation of Vinen’s equation has been obtained by Schwarz 8 using the vortex filament model and assuming homogeneous and isotropic turbulence. Recently Lipniacki 9 has modified the Vinen-Schwarz equation, intro- ducing in it the effects of the anisotropy. He characterizes the anisotropy by means of a vector I, related to the vortex tangle structure by I = s' s/ |s|, where s, tdescribes the vortex lines, with the length along the vortices; the primes indicate differentiation with respect to . Angular brackets stand for averages over the total vortex length of the tangle. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 72, 104515 2005 1098-0121/2005/7210/1045158/$23.00 ©2005 The American Physical Society 104515-1