IOP PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF MICROMECHANICS AND MICROENGINEERING
J. Micromech. Microeng. 17 (2007) 1387–1393 doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/7/022
Polymeric mask protection for alternative
KOH silicon wet etching
G Canavese, S L Marasso, M Quaglio, M Cocuzza, C Ricciardi
and C F Pirri
LATEMAR Unit Politecnico di Torino, Materials and Microsystems Laboratory (χ -Lab),
Via Lungo Piazza D’Armi 6, 10034 Chivasso (Torino), Italy
E-mail: giancarlo.canavese@polito.it
Received 19 February 2007, in final form 20 April 2007
Published 14 June 2007
Online at stacks.iop.org/JMM/17/1387
Abstract
A new cost-effective setup for silicon bulk micromachining is presented
which makes use of a polymeric protective coating, ProTEK
R
B2 coating,
instead of a conventional hardmask. Different concentrations of KOH and
bath conditions (pure, with surfactant, with stirrer, with both surfactant and
stirrer) have been considered. ProTEK
R
B2 coating exhibits good adhesion
to Si substrates, no degradation, etching rates and surface roughness
comparable to literature data, and etching times greater than 180 min
without damaging front side microstructures. Microcantilevers have also
been fabricated using two different process flows in order to demonstrate the
suitability of such a protective coating in microelectromechanical system
(MEMS) technology.
(Some figures in this article are in colour only in the electronic version)
1. Introduction
Silicon bulk micromachining is traditionally applied in the
field of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for the
fabrication of thin membranes [1, 2], released cantilevers [3–5]
and other free-standing structures for mass, acceleration, flow,
rotation and pressure sensing [6, 7]. Recently, this process
step has become a key point process for micro- and nano-size
fluidic chips [8] as well as micro-optical elements [9].
Bulk micromachining often requires the deposition of a
hardmask layer, such as silicon nitride or silicon oxide, on the
sample front side to prevent undesired etching of the already
patterned structures [10, 11]. However, hardmask deposition
techniques such as low-pressure chemical vapour deposition
(LPCVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition
(PECVD) both exhibit some problems. LPCVD requires high
temperatures, which can induce unwanted mechanical stress
in the layer [12], while PECVD silicon nitride and/or oxide
exhibit a fair etch rate in KOH.
Alternatives to using a hardmask can be the use of a
Teflon
R
cell with O-rings or a polymeric protective coating.
The first approach requires the development of a more
complex experimental setup to mask the sample, while sealing
and clamping of the cell can seriously compromise the
effectiveness of this method. Furthermore, any possible
fracture of a membrane can directly compromise the integrity
of the whole wafer surface. In contrast, the use of a polymeric
protective coating, directly deposited on a Si surface, has been
recently proposed as a very efficient and cost-effective solution
to the problem [13, 14]. This configuration does not introduce
any mechanical stress and prevents the possible etching of
the coated front side surface when a fracture of a membrane
occurs.
The aim of this work is to investigate the compatibility
of a polymeric protective coating, ProTEK
R
B2 coating,
under different bath conditions during a KOH Si bulk
micromachining. For such purpose, three main parameters
were identified: the Si etch rate, selectivity of the Si etch rate
with respect to the SiO
2
etch rate and the roughness of the
etched surface. These three values have been characterized
with varying KOH concentration (20%, 30%, 40% by weight)
under four different bath conditions: pure, with sodium
dihexyl sulfosuccinate (SDSS) surfactant, with mechanical
agitation (by stirrer) and with both surfactant and stirrer
agitation.
In the second part of the paper, two different process
flows used for microcantilever fabrication are shown in order
to investigate the compatibility of the polymeric coating within
an entire MEMS process flow.
0960-1317/07/071387+07$30.00 © 2007 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK 1387