Brief Genetics Report
Association and Haplotype Analysis of the
Insulin-Degrading Enzyme (IDE) Gene, a Strong
Positional and Biological Candidate for Type 2 Diabetes
Susceptibility
Christopher J. Groves,
1,2
Steven Wiltshire,
2,3
Damian Smedley,
3
Katherine R. Owen,
4
Timothy M. Frayling,
4
Mark Walker,
5
Graham A. Hitman,
6
Jonathan C. Levy,
1
Stephen O’Rahilly,
7
Stephan Menzel,
2
Andrew T. Hattersley,
4
and Mark I. McCarthy
1,2,3
The gene for insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) repre-
sents a strong positional and biological candidate for
type 2 diabetes susceptibility. IDE maps to chromosome
10q23.3, a region linked to diabetes in several popula-
tions; the rat homolog has been directly implicated in
diabetes susceptibility; and known functions of IDE
support an important role in glucose homeostasis. We
sought evidence for association between IDE variation
and diabetes by mutation screening, defining local hap-
lotype structure, and genotyping variants delineating
common haplotypic diversity. An initial case-control
analysis (628 diabetic probands from multiplex sibships
and 604 control subjects) found no haplotypic associa-
tions, although one variant (IDE2, 179T3 C) showed
modest association with diabetes (odds ratio [OR]1.25,
P 0.03). Linkage partitioning analyses failed to sup-
port this association, but provided borderline evidence
for a different variant (IDE10, IVS20–405A3 G) (P
0.06). Neither variant was associated with diabetes
when replication was sought in 377 early onset diabetic
subjects and 825 control subjects, though combined
analysis of all typed cohorts indicated a nominally
significant effect at IDE2 (OR 1.21 [1.04–1.40], P
0.013). In the absence of convincing support for this
association from linkage partitioning or analyses of
continuous measures of glycemia, we conclude that
analysis of over 2,400 samples provides no compelling
evidence that variation in IDE contributes to diabetes
susceptibility in humans. Diabetes 52:1300 –1305, 2003
L
inkage disequilibrium analysis within candidate
genes represents the final common pathway for
the identification of diabetes-susceptibility genes.
Candidate selection is typically based on posi-
tional information from linkage studies in humans and
rodent models and/or a perceived match between the
gene’s function and the pathophysiology of the condition.
Several independent lines of evidence suggest a role for
the gene encoding the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE:
LOCUSLINK reference 3416; EC reference 3.4.24.56) in
type 2 diabetes pathogenesis, making this a promising
candidate for analysis. First, IDE maps to a region, on
chromosome 10q, showing evidence for linkage to type 2
diabetes in several populations. In a genomewide scan of
573 U.K. type 2 diabetic pedigrees, evidence for linkage
(multipoint logarithm of odds [LOD] = 1.99) peaked near
to D10S1765, only 4 Mb from IDE, and conditional analy-
ses have suggested epistatic interaction with the well-
replicated susceptibility locus on chromosome 1q (1).
Linkage to 10q has also been reported in Finns (2), North
American Europeans (3), Mexican Americans (4), and
French (5), though the latter two map 40 –50 cM telomeric
and may reflect a distinct locus.
Second, the rat homolog of IDE is directly implicated in
type 2 diabetes susceptibility. In the GK rat model (6,7), a
locus for poststimulation glycemia was mapped to a region
of rat chromosome 1 syntenic with human 10q23-26 (8,9)
and subsequently localized to a 1-cM region around Ide
(10). Two amino-acid substitutions in Ide were found in
susceptible congenic strains, which, together, conferred
postprandial hyperglycemia and reduced insulin degrada-
tion in isolated muscle cells, and other diabetes-related
phenotypes (10).
Third, the known and presumed functions of IDE are
From the
1
Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism,
Oxford, U.K.;
2
Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, U.K.;
3
Genetics and Genomics Research Institute, Imperial College Faculty of
Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K.;
4
Centre for Molecular Genet-
ics, Peninsular Medical School, Exeter, U.K.;
5
School of Clinical Medical
Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, U.K.; the
6
Department of
Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine, Bart’s and the London Queen Mary’s School
of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.; and the
7
Departments of Medicine
and Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, U.K.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Mark McCarthy,
Robert Turner Professor of Diabetes, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocri-
nology and Metabolism, Churchill Site, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3
7LJ, U.K. E-mail: mark.mccarthy@drl.ox.ac.uk.
Received for publication 5 November 2002 and accepted in revised form 10
February 2003.
Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org.
CON, control; DIF, Diabetes in Families Study; ECACC, European Collec-
tion of Cell Cultures; HAP, haplotype; IDE, insulin-degrading enzyme; LOD,
logarithm of odds; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; NPL,
nonparametric linkage; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism;
UTR, untranslated region; W2P, Warren 2 probands; W2T, Warren 2 trios;
YT2D, young type 2 diabetes.
© 2003 by the American Diabetes Association.
1300 DIABETES, VOL. 52, MAY 2003