Behavioural Processes 57 (2002) 71 – 88
Habituation, memory and the brain: the dynamics of
interval timing
J.E.R. Staddon
a,
*, I.M Chelaru
a
, J.J. Higa
b
a
Department of Psychology: Experimental, Duke Uniersity, Duraham, NC 27708, USA
b
Texas Christian Uniersity, Texas, USA
Accepted 27 November 2001
Abstract
Memory decay is rapid at first and slower later—a feature that accounts for Jost’s memory law: that old memories
gain on newer ones with lapse of time. The rate-sensitive property of habituation — that recovery after spaced stimuli
may be slower than after massed — provides a clue to the dynamics of memory decay. Rate-sensitive habituation can
be modeled by a cascade of thresholded integrator units that have a counterpart in human brain areas identified by
magnetic source imaging (MSI). The memory trace component of the multiple-time-scale model for habituation can
provide a ‘clock’ that has the properties necessary to account for both static and dynamic properties of interval
timing: static proportional and Weber-law timing as well as dynamic tracking of progressive, ‘impulse’ and periodic
interval sequences. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Magnetic source imaging; Interval timing; Memory decay
www.elsevier.com/locate/behavproc
1. Introduction
When hungry animals are given a bit of food at
regular intervals they soon learn to anticipate its
arrival. When food delivery is response-indepen-
dent, the procedure is termed temporal condition-
ing; when it depends on the emission of an
operant response after a fixed time, it is called a
fixed-interval schedule. In the years since Pavlov
and Skinner identified these procedures, numer-
ous variants have been studied. All share two
defining features: a to-be-timed interval, and a
time marker, from which the interval is measured.
In temporal conditioning, a fixed-interval (FI)
schedule, or the response-initiated-delay (RID)
schedule (Fig. 1, top), food delivery is the time
marker. On procedures such as the peak-interval
procedure or delay conditioning, some aspect of
the transition from intertrial interval to trial onset
constitutes the time marker. On spaced-respond-
ing schedules, each response is a time marker.
Usual practice in the study of interval timing is
to expose the animal to the procedure for many
intervals over many days, seeking the steady-state
relation between the pattern of responding and
the duration of the to-be-timed interval. Two
properties have received a lot of attention. Pro-
portional timing is the fact that many measures of
timing are in the steady-state proportional to the
to-be-timed interval: wait-time (time to first re-
sponse, pause) on fixed-interval or RID schedules,
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: staddon@psych.duke.edu (J.E.R. Staddon).
0376-6357/02/$ - see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0376-6357(02)00006-2