Effects of docosahexaenoic acid on in vitro amyloid beta peptide 2535 brillation Michio Hashimoto a, , Hossain Md Shahdat a,b , Masanori Katakura a , Yoko Tanabe a , Shuji Gamoh a , Koji Miwa a , Toshio Shimada c , Osamu Shido a a Department of Environmental Physiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan b Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh c Department of Internal Medicine, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan abstract article info Article history: Received 9 October 2008 Received in revised form 22 December 2008 Accepted 16 January 2009 Available online 29 January 2009 Keywords: Docosahexaenoic acid Alzheimer's disease Aβ 2535 brillation Amyloid β peptide 2535 (Aβ 2535 ) encompasses one of the neurotoxic domains of full length Aβ 140/42 , the major proteinaceous component of amyloid deposits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated the effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6, n-3), an essential brain polyunsaturated fatty acid, on the in vitro brillation of Aβ 2535 and found that it signicantly reduced the degree of brillation, as shown by a decrease in the intensity of both the thioavin T and green uorescence in confocal microscopy. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that DHA-incubated samples were virtually devoid of structured brils but had an amorphous-like consistency, whereas the controls contained structured bers of various widths and lengths. The in vitro brillation of Aβ 2535 appeared to be pH-dependent, with the strongest effect seen at pH 5.0. DHA inhibited brillation at all pHs, with the strongest effect at pH 7.4. It also signicantly decreased the levels of Aβ 2535 oligomers. Nonreductive gradient gel electrophoresis revealed that the molecular size of the oligomers of Aβ 2535 was 10 kDa (equivalent to decamers of Aβ 2535 ) and that DHA dose-dependently reduced these decamers. These results suggest that DHA decreases the in vitro brillation of Aβ 2535 by inhibiting the oligomeric amyloid species and, therefore, Aβ 2535 -related neurotoxicity or behavioral impairment could be restrained by DHA. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Deposition of insoluble neuritic plaques and neurobrillar tangles of amyloid β peptides (Aβ) in the brain is the neuropathological stamp of Alzheimer's disease (AD), characterized by progressive loss of neurons and the deterioration of memory-related learning ability [1]. The major components of neuritic plaques are the 4042-amino acid- residue-long Aβs that are proteolytically released from membrane- bound amyloid precursor proteins (APP) [2]. After intersecting with the environment, these Aβs self-transform from their native coiled α- helical structures into insoluble brillar forms [3]. Although Aβ 140 and Aβ 142 are the predominant forms, other fragments can be present as well: in the brains of aged patients, Aβ 2535 , a stretch of 11 amino acid- long residues of the full length from position 25 to 35, is produced by the proteolysis of full-length Aβ 140 [4]. The Aβ 2535 fragment is biologically active and analogous to its full length Aβs [5]; it is thus conceivable that learning-related memory impairment could also be induced by the infusion of this short amyloid into the cerebral ventricle of rats. The hypothesis that Aβ 2535 forms brils and confers toxicity analogous to that of the full-length peptide has been proved by in vitro studies with neurons [6]. These ndings are further supported by in vivo studies demonstrating that direct cerebral infusion of Aβ 2535 into the ventricle impairs memory in mice [7,8]. We have previously reported that the memory impairment of Aβ 140 -infused AD model rats is ameliorated and/or prevented by the dietary administration of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6, n-3) [9,10]. The brain utilizes large amounts of DHA before birth, during growth spurts and throughout the growing periods [1112]. The level of DHA decreases in the hippocampus of AD patients [13]. Accordingly, dietary intervention with DHA has been shown to improve AD-related symptoms [14], and supplementation with DHA has been associated with the improve- ment of neurobehavioral complications in AD model animals [15]. Recently, it has been shown that DHA signicantly decreases the cerebral cortical levels of Aβ peptides with concomitant ameliorative effects on memory-related learning ability [9,10,15]. Though the amyloid deposition is considered as one of the key steps in the pathogenesis of AD and DHA could be targeted as one of the potential therapies to clear up the amyloid deposits [9,10,15], the mechanism of the action of DHA on the in vitro brillation is scarcely reported. In vitro polymerization is postulated to be a model that explains well the mechanistic milieu of brillation of Aβ proteins in AD. Thus, the direct interruption of amyloid bril formation by DHA would be predicted to relate its Aβ-clearance from the in vivo scenario of AD brain. The effect of DHA on neurodegenerative diseases is very signicant in that DHA benets brain functions. Numerous structural and functional studies on full-length Aβ s have also stressed the role of Aβ 2535 in neurotoxicity: Aβ 2535 induces neuronal cell death [16], Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1791 (2009) 289296 Corresponding author. Tel.: +81853 20 2110; fax: +81853 20 2110. E-mail address: michio1@med.shimane-u.ac.jp (M. Hashimoto). 1388-1981/$ see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.01.012 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biochimica et Biophysica Acta journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bbalip