Comparison of Left Ventricular–Biventricular Pacing on
Ventricular Synchrony, Mitral Regurgitation, and
Global Left Ventricular Function in Patients With
Severe Chronic Heart Failure
Dragos Vinereanu, MD, Rob Bleasdale, MD, Mark Turner, MD,
Michael P. Frenneaux, MD, and Alan G. Fraser, MD
We compared the effects of left ventricular and biven-
tricular pacing in 16 patients (15 men and 1 woman;
aged 64 8 years) with severe heart failure by
conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography.
Intraventricular synchrony, regional and global sys-
tolic function, diastolic function and filling time, and
the severity of secondary mitral regurgitation were
similar between left ventricular and biventricular
pacing. 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
(Am J Cardiol 2004;94:519 –521)
C
ardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown
to reduce mortality from progressive heart failure
in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunc-
tion.
1
It also improves exercise capacity, symptoms,
and quality of life. The mechanisms responsible for
these benefits are improved synchrony of the left and
right ventricle (interventricular synchrony),
2,3
im-
proved synchrony of the different segments of the left
ventricle (intraventricular synchrony),
4
and decreased
secondary mitral regurgitation.
5
LV pacing alone has
exhibited comparable improvements to biventricular
(BiV) pacing during acute hemodynamic or echocar-
diographic evaluation.
6–8
However, no detailed com-
parative data on the acute effects of LV versus BiV
pacing on intra- and interventricular synchrony are
available. We set up a crossover study to compare the
effects of LV and BiV pacing on ventricular syn-
chrony, mitral regurgitation, and global systolic and
diastolic function using conventional and tissue Dopp-
ler echocardiography.
•••
Sixteen consecutive patients (aged 64 8 years;
15 men and 1 woman) with a BiV InSync III pace-
maker (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota) were
studied between 1 and 6 months after transvenous
implantation, with a lead placed via the coronary sinus
over the free wall of the left ventricle. Right-sided
cardiac leads were conventionally placed in the right
atrial appendage and the right ventricular apex.
All patients were in sinus rhythm when unpaced,
and patients with aortic or mitral valve stenosis, peri-
cardial disease, or cor pulmonale were excluded. Be-
fore pacing, the duration of the QRS complex was 135
31 ms. Three patients (19%) were in New York
Heart Association functional class II, 12 patients
(75%) were in class III, and 1 patient (6%) was in
class IV. Etiology of heart failure was ischemic in 11
patients (70%) and nonischemic in 5 (30%). Fifteen
patients were taking an angiotensin-converting en-
zyme inhibitor, 2 were on a blocker, and all were
taking a loop diuretic. The protocol was approved by
the local research ethics committee, and each patient
gave written informed consent.
The paced atrioventricular delay was optimized by
conventional Doppler assessment of transmitral flow.
9
The pacemaker was switched off, and after 10 minutes
of rest, a detailed transthoracic echocardiographic
study was performed. The pacemaker was then repro-
grammed to atrio-LV mode, and the echocardio-
graphic study was repeated after another 10-minute
period of stabilization. Finally, the pacemaker was
reprogrammed to BiV mode with simultaneous VV
stimulation, and echocardiography was performed
again after a further 10-minute period of stabilization.
This sequence was used for all patients. Heart rate was
measured during each stage. The electrocardiogram
was recorded simultaneously.
Patients were studied in the left lateral decubitus
position using a commercially available ultrasound
system equipped with tissue Doppler (Vingmed Sys-
tem 5, GE Vingmed, Horten, Norway), using a 1.5- to
2.5-MHz transducer. Digital echocardiographic data
were acquired during passively held end-expiration.
Standard echocardiographic studies consisted of
M-mode, cross-sectional, and Doppler blood flow
measurements. LV ejection fraction was calculated by
the modified biplane Simpson’s method. The rate of
increase in LV pressure in systole was estimated from
the continuous-wave Doppler trace of the mitral re-
gurgitant jet, between velocities of 1 and 3 m/s.
10
Global diastolic function was assessed from color
M-mode recordings of mitral inflow, and flow propa-
gation velocity was measured.
11
Filling time was mea-
sured from pulse-wave Doppler recording of the trans-
mitral flow. The severity of secondary mitral
regurgitation was estimated in the apical 4-chamber
view by measuring the width of the vena contracta
12
and by calculating the regurgitant orifice area using
the proximal isovelocity surface–area method.
13
Tissue Doppler echocardiography used 5 standard
imaging planes: parasternal long-axis, parasternal
short-axis, apical 4-chamber, apical 2-chamber, and
apical long-axis views. Myocardial velocities and tim-
From the Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Dr.
Fraser’s address is: Wales Heart Research Institute, University of
Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United
Kingdom. E-mail: fraserag@cf.ac.uk. Manuscript received February 2,
2004; revised manuscript received and accepted April 22, 2004.
519 ©2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved. 0002-9149/04/$–see front matter
The American Journal of Cardiology Vol. 94 August 15, 2004 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.072