Animal Science Journal (2005) 76, 581–586 581 Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKASJAnimal Science Journal1344-39412005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty LtdDecember 2005766581586Original Article Carcass grade and predictor measurementsK. UETAKE et al . Correspondence: Katsuji Uetake, School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University, Sagamihara-shi, 229-8501, Japan. (Email: uetake@azabu-u.ac.jp) Received 16 February 2005; accepted for publication 26 May 2005. ORIGINAL ARTICLE Differences between carcass grades in some morphological, behavioral and physiological measurements at early and middle stages of fattening in crossbred steers Katsuji UETAKE, 1 Toshie ISHIWATA, 1 Naoshige ABE, 2 Yusuke EGUCHI 1 and Toshio TANAKA 1 1 School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University, Sagamihara-shi and 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Tamagawa University, Machida-shi, Japan ABSTRACT The differential variables for carcass grades were identified from morphological, behavioral and physiological measure- ments of young steers at a commercial farm. Thirty-five Japanese Black × Holstein steers aged 6–10 months were randomly assigned to three pens. The steers had free access to ryegrass hay and a restricted amount of concentrate diet for the first 6 months of trial. They were then given oat straw ad libitum and an additional concentrate diet until slaughter. Behavioral observations (15 categories) were carried out once every 2 weeks for 2 h after feeding. Bodyweight was measured, blood sampled (for seven metabolic hormones and five metabolites), ultrasonic scanning conducted and physical measurements taken (10 parts for each animal) in months 1, 3 and 5 (early fattening stage, EFS) and in months 7, 9 and 11 (middle fat- tening stage, MFS) of the trial. Temperament scores during these procedures, entry order into restraint stalls, social rank and average daily gain were also assessed. A factor analysis and one-way ANOVA were used to identify clusters of variables which had different factor scores between carcass grades. As for the carcass yields, a cluster of chest girth and depth, body- weight, withers and hip height, and rump length ( P < 0.01), and a cluster of the frequency of scratching the body with facilities (P < 0.05) were identified as differential variables in the EFS. In the MFS, a cluster of concentrations of cortisol and epinephrine, and the frequency of eating straw were identified (P < 0.10). As for the carcass quality grade, a cluster of social rank, triglyceride concentration and the frequencies of stand-chewing cud and eating hay, and a cluster of the fre- quency of investigating facilities (both P < 0.10) were identified in the EFS. In the MFS, a cluster of hip height, bodyweight, cannon circumference, chest depth, withers height and chest girth, and a cluster of the frequencies of eating a concentrate diet and stand-chewing the cud, and social rank (both P < 0.10) were identified. In conclusion, bodyweight, chest girth and depth, withers and hip height were identified as good differential variables for future carcass grades of young steers. Facil- ity enrichment that encourages steers to eat hay in the EFS, and to eat a concentrate diet in and after the MFS would be effective in upgrading carcass grades. High incidence of investigating and scratching the body with facilities and stand- chewing the cud might lead to lower carcass grades. KEYWORDS: beef cattle, behavior, carcass grades, physical characteristics, physiology. INTRODUCTION Livestock dealers and beef feeders draw upon many types of information to buy cattle at market. Of course, genetic data like pedigree are prime information, but they make the final choices according to the cattle’s