Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: evidence from the design sector in Greece Vasilis Avdikos* and Athanasios Kalogeresis** *Department of Economic and Regional Development, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece Email: v.avdikos@gmail.com **School of Spatial Planning and Development, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece Revised manuscript received 21 March 2016 Third places, such as business incubators, co-working spaces and work collectives, represent a new ecosystem of collaborative working practices in the creative economy that alters significantly the spatial distribution of work and the notion of ‘workplace’. Collaborative workplaces emerged after the gradual collapse of the stable employment paradigm that was one of the main features of the Keynesian welfare state and as a response to precarious working conditions that were augmented during the recent economic crisis and the subsequent recession. The paper contributes to the critical understanding of these new geographies of workplace and working conditions that third places manifest. Using data from a large survey about the economics and the working conditions of Greek designers and from four interviews with freelancers in work collectives and facilitators of co-working spaces, the paper sheds light on the socio-economic profile and the working conditions of Greek freelance designers that use co-working spaces and work collectives as means of reducing precarious working conditions and personal–professional risks. The results show that designers in third places, in contrast to freelancers who use formal workplaces or work from home, work long hours with poor pay and a large proportion have no safety net with regard to social security. Third places can be enclaves of the shadow economy and of very specific precarious working conditions. On the other hand, third places help freelance designers become more embedded to business networks, both local and foreign, rather than working in isolation. Networking effects between freelancers and self-employed who choose to work in third places usually result in greater opportunities for outsourcing and subcontracting and in more exports. Key words: Athens, Greece, co-working spaces, precarity, third places, survey, work collectives Introduction The digitisation of the modern world and the growing importance of the creative industries has seen a global restructuring in business ecosystems, the working lives of millions of people and the spatial distribution of work. New hybrid workspaces (third places; Oldenburg 1989) such as fab labs, hackerspaces and co-working spaces (hereafter CSs), offer freelancers, self-employees and entrepreneurs the ability to take advantage of both geo- graphical and virtual proximity. This paper describes the economic (income) and social (age, gender, education) profile of those working in just such ‘third’ places and examines the reasons third places are used, the benefits they offer and the level of satisfaction they provide according to functionality and working conditions (hours The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG). © 2016 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers). Area, 2016, doi: 10.1111/area.12279