Prospective Validation of the Rockall Risk Scoring
System for Upper GI Hemorrhage in Subgroups of
Patients With Varices and Peptic Ulcers
D. S. Sanders, M.R.C.P., M. J. Carter, M.R.C.P., R. J. Goodchap, M.B.B.S., S. S. Cross, M.D., M.R.C.Path.,
D. C. Gleeson, M.D., F.R.C.P., and A. J. Lobo, M.D., F.R.C.P.
Gastroenterology and Liver Unit and Department of Histopathology, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital,
Sheffield, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVES: The Rockall risk assessment score was devised
to allow prediction of the risk of rebleeding and death in
patients with upper GI hemorrhage. The score was derived
by multivariate analysis in a cohort of patients with upper GI
hemorrhage and subsequently validated in a second cohort.
Only 4.4% of patients included in the initial study had
esophageal varices, and analysis was not performed accord-
ing to the etiology of the bleeding. Our aim was to assess the
validity of the Rockall risk scoring system in predicting
rebleeding and mortality in patients with esophageal varices
or peptic ulcers.
METHODS: Admissions (n = 358) over 32 months to a
single specialist GI bleeding unit were scored prospectively.
The distribution of episodes of rebleeding and mortality by
Rockall score were statistically analyzed using Fisher’s ex-
act test with 99% CIs calculated using a Monte Carlo
method. The Child-Pugh score was determined in patients
with esophageal varices.
RESULTS: The Rockall score was predictive of both rebleed-
ing and mortality in patients with variceal hemorrhage (both
ps 0.0005), as was the Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001 and
p 0.0005, respectively). The initial Rockall score was
predictive of mortality in patients with peptic ulcers (p =
0.01), although the complete score was not (p 0.05). The
complete score did, however, predict rebleeding in these
patients (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to validate the Rockall
score in specific subgroups of patients with esophageal
varices or peptic ulcers and suggests that it is particularly
applicable to variceal hemorrhage. (Am J Gastroenterol
2002;97:630 – 635. © 2002 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterol-
ogy)
INTRODUCTION
Acute upper GI hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common reason for
emergency hospital admission, with an incidence in the
United Kingdom of between 50 and 150 per 100,000 adults
per year (1–3). The mortality of UGIH has been reported to
vary from 4% to 14% (3–7).
Scoring systems have been derived to identify patients at
greatest risk for UGIH (8 –10). Among these, the largest
epidemiological study in the United Kingdom was con-
ducted by Rockall et al. on behalf of the steering committee
of the National Audit for UGIH (3). This was a multicenter
study involving 4185 adult cases of UGIH from 74 hospi-
tals. After this initial study a numerical scoring system was
derived that included as independent predictors of mortality
advancing age, shock, comorbidity, endoscopic diagnosis,
major stigmata of recent hemorrhage,and rebleeding (Table
1) (11). Subsequently, a second cohort of 1625 patients was
tested for applicability and the scoring system demonstrated
a reproducible prediction of mortality (11).
The original Rockall study did not analyze whether the
scoring system was applicable to subgroups of patients
categorized according to diagnosis. In addition, esophageal
varices accounted for only 180 cases (4.4%) of UGIH, and
in the second cohort the number of patients with this diag-
nosis was not specified.
The Child-Pugh score is a widely accepted and validated
grading system used for the prognostic assessment of pa-
tients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal varices (12, 13).
The aim of our study was therefore to assess the validity
of the Rockall score for the prediction of rebleeding and
death in patients with peptic ulceration or esophageal vari-
ces. In addition, we assessed the value of the Child-Pugh
score for patients with esophageal varices.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Our university hospital provides a subregional tertiary ser-
vice for patients with esophageal varices. Patients with
suspected UGIH are admitted to a dedicated unit with 24-h
on-call and review by either a gastroenterology specialist
registrar or a consultant. There are endoscopy facilities on
the unit. We recommend that all patients have gastroscopies
performed within 24 h of their UGIHs.
There are standardized guidelines for the management of
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 97, No. 3, 2002
© 2002 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology ISSN 0002-9270/02/$22.00
Published by Elsevier Science Inc. PII S0002-9270(01)04103-X