GA-BASED PREDICTION OF ANTENNA
RADIATION PATTERNS FROM PLANAR
NEAR-FIELD SAMPLES
J. R. Pe ´ rez and J. Basterrechea
Department of Communications Engineering
University of Cantabria
Avda. de Los Castros s/n
39005 Santander, Spain
Received 12 November 2002
ABSTRACT: In this paper, a genetic-algorithm (GA) based approach
for predicting the far-field pattern of an antenna under test (AUT) from
planar near-field samples is presented. The method reconstructs the an-
tenna radiation pattern from an optimized equivalent model of the AUT
consisting of electric and magnetic short dipoles. Numerical results
showing predicted far-field patterns are reported and discussed. © 2003
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 37: 235–236, 2003;
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
DOI 10.1002/mop.10880
Key words: near field; far field; antenna measurements; genetic algo-
rithms
INTRODUCTION
Among the most well-known planar near-field (NF) to far-field
(FF) transformation techniques [1, 2], the fast-Fourier-transform
(FFT) based method is the most popular one, involving a low
degree of mathematical and computational complexity. In this
paper, another approach based on a global optimization technique
is proposed as a powerful and versatile alternative to classical
methods. The method is applicable to NF–FF transformation,
making it possible to estimate the far-field pattern of the antenna
under test (AUT) from the tangential components of its near field,
measured or computed over a planar surface. Basically, it uses
near-field data to determine the excitation of a set of dipoles
distributed over a fictitious planar surface that encompasses the
AUT. Then, the far-field radiation pattern can be estimated from
these equivalent dipoles.
DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD
Using the equivalence principle, the radiation of an AUT can be
modeled using equivalent electric and magnetic current densities
distributed over a surface enclosing the source. In this approach,
these current densities are modeled by means of electric and
magnetic short dipoles, uniformly spaced on a surface S
e
that
encompasses the antenna aperture, as shown in Figure 1. The goal
is to optimize the equivalent model in such a way that it radiates
as close as possible to the original AUT, using the information
provided by the grid of near-field samples S
f
as a reference.
Let us suppose N electric and magnetic dipoles are used to
reproduce the radiation pattern of an AUT from L near-field
samples, E
l
. The spherical components of the electric field radiated
by the whole set of dipoles at each near-field point are given by
E
d
= E
e
+ E
m
=
i=1
N/2
[R
i
]
-1
[T
i
]
-1
E
ei
+
i=1
N/2
[R
i
]
-1
[T
i
]
-1
E
mi
, (1)
where [R
i
] and [T
i
] represent the rotation and translation matrixes
used to express the fields in the global coordinate system as a
function of the fields radiated by an isolated and z -directed electric
or magnetic dipole, E
ei
and E
mi
, given by
E
eir
=
2
M
i
e
jPi
cos
i
R
i, l
2
1 +
1
jkR
i, l
e
-jkRi,l
, (2)
E
ei
=
j k
4
M
i
e
jPi
sin
i
R
i, l
1 +
1
jkR
i, l
-
1
kR
i, l
2
e
-jkRi,l
, (3)
E
mi
=
-jk
4
M
i
e
jPi
sin
i
R
i, l
1 +
1
jkR
i, l
e
-jkRi,l
, (4)
where M
i
and P
i
are the amplitude and phase (respectively) of the
dipolar moment for the dipole i , R
i , l
is the distance between the
source point i and the observation point l , is the free-space
impedance, and k is the wave number. The number, type, location,
and orientation for each dipole are known parameters, which
depend on the AUT and the frequency. Thus, the only parameters
in Eqs. (1)–(4) available to shape the radiation pattern of the AUT
are the dipolar moments. The optimization is carried out using
genetic algorithms (GAs) [3], in which a set of chromosomes or
potential solutions is made to evolve as the result of the pressure
exerted by three mechanisms: selection, crossover, and mutation.
Each chromosome C in Eq. (5) represents a vector to be optimized:
C = M
1
, P
1
,..., M
i
, P
i
,..., M
N
, P
N
. (5)
The aim is to maximize the fitness function given by Eq. (6),
linking the near-field data E
l
and the near-field radiated by the
equivalent model E
d
(C), so as to find that vector C which best fits
the L near-field samples. Once the GA-based process reaches an
accurate solution, the far-field pattern can be computed from Eqs.
(1)–(4) under far-field conditions.
F =
l=1
L
1
1 + | E
l
- E
d
(C)|
2
(6)
The main parameters of the binary GA used [4] are listed in
Table 1. The accuracy of the method depends mainly on the type
of AUT to be analyzed, on the near-field data, and on the number,
spacing, and type of dipoles used.
Figure 1 Equivalent model for the AUT
MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 37, No. 4, May 20 2003 235