Association of Plasma Atrial Natriuretic Peptide,
N-Terminal Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide, and
Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels with Coronary
Artery Stenosis in Patients with Normal Left
Ventricular Systolic Function
Toshio Nishikimi, MD, PhD, Yosuke Mori, MD, PhD, Kimihiko Ishimura, MD,
Kazuyoshi Tadokoro, MD, Hiroshi Yagi, MD, Akihisa Yabe, MD, PhD,
Shigeo Horinaka, MD, PhD, Hiroaki Matsuoka, MD, PhD
PURPOSE: To examine whether coronary artery stenosis af-
fects plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-termi-
nal proatrial natriuretic peptide (proANP), and brain natri-
uretic peptide (BNP) in patients with normal left ventricular
systolic function.
METHODS: We studied 104 consecutive patients with normal
left ventricular function and suspected coronary artery stenosis.
Plasma natriuretic peptide levels were measured by immunora-
diometric assays.
RESULTS: Plasma levels of ANP, N-terminal proANP, and
BNP were higher in patients with (n = 65) than in those without
(n = 39) coronary artery stenosis, whereas hemodynamic vari-
ables were similar. Patients who had coronary artery stenosis
with only distal lesions (n = 36) had higher levels of all three
natriuretic peptides than did patients with no coronary artery
stenosis. N-terminal proANP levels were significantly higher in
patients who had coronary artery stenosis with proximal lesions
(n = 29) than in patients who had coronary artery stenosis with
only distal lesions and those with no coronary artery stenosis.
Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that N-terminal
proANP, but not ANP or BNP, was independently associated
with coronary artery stenosis after adjusting for clinical and
demographic variables (odds ratio per 100 fmol/mL increase =
1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.9 to 2.6; P = 0.01). However, the
sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive val-
ues of each peptide were not sufficiently high to be used for
prediction.
CONCLUSION: N-terminal proANP may be associated with
clinically important coronary artery stenosis in patients with
normal left ventricular systolic function, but its clinical useful-
ness may be limited. Am J Med. 2004;116:517–523. ©2004 by
Excerpta Medica Inc.
M
any studies have shown that plasma levels of
atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-terminal
proatrial natriuretic peptide (proANP), and
brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are elevated in patients
with heart failure (1– 4), acute myocardial infarction (5–
8), and hypertension (9 –11). These circulating cardiac
peptides reflect cardiac function, remodeling, and hyper-
trophy (12–14) and can be used to predict outcomes in
cardiovascular diseases (15–18). Recently, these peptides
have received considerable attention for their use in
screening tests in clinical trials and population-based
studies (19 –21).
Atrial natriuretic peptide is stored as proANP in atrial
myocytes (22). On secretion, proANP is cleaved to bio-
logically active -ANP and N-terminal proANP in
equimolar amounts (23). Atrial natriuretic peptide is
cleared rapidly (half-life of 2.5 minutes) from plasma by
specifically binding to peripheral receptors and, to some
extent, by enzymatic degradation. In contrast, N-termi-
nal proANP is not cleared by binding to receptors and
therefore has a longer half-life. Findings from several
studies (24 –26) suggest that N-terminal proANP may be
a better marker for the detection of high-grade coronary
artery stenosis.
Brain natriuretic peptide, a cardiac hormone secreted
mainly by the cardiac ventricles, has been used as a non-
invasive marker and a prognostic indicator of right or left
ventricular dysfunction (14 –18). Studies assessing its di-
agnostic usefulness in coronary artery disease have re-
ported that plasma BNP levels are increased in unstable
angina and acute coronary artery syndromes, perhaps re-
lated to left ventricular function (18,27,28). To date,
however, whether plasma BNP levels are increased in pa-
tients with coronary artery stenosis who have normal left
ventricular function remains unknown.
From the Department of Hypertension and Cardiorenal Medicine,
Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
This work was supported in part by Scientific Research Grants-in-Aid
1167073 and 14570692 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology and by the Science Research Promotion Fund
from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of
Japan.
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Toshio Nishikimi, MD,
PhD, Department of Hypertension and Cardiorenal Medicine, Dokkyo
University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi 321– 0293, Japan, or
nishikim@dokkyomed.ac.jp.
Manuscript submitted June 3, 2003, and accepted in revised form
December 9, 2003.
© 2004 by Excerpta Medica Inc. 0002-9343/04/$–see front matter 517
All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.022