VOL 5: MARCH • MARS 2005 d Canadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien 387 Medical errors in primary care Results of an international study of family practice Walter Rosser, MD, CCFP, FCFP, MRCGP(UK) Susan Dovey, MD, MSC Risa Bordman, MD David White, MD, CCFP, FCFP Eric Crighton, MSC Neil Drummond, PHD ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To describe errors Canadian family physicians found in their practices and reported to study investigators. To compare errors reported by Canadian family physicians with those reported by physicians in five other countries. DESIGN Analytical study of reports of errors. The Linnaeus Collaboration was formed to study medical errors in primary care. General practitioners in six countries, including a new Canadian family practice research network (Nortren), anonymously reported errors in their practices between June and December 2001. An evolving taxonomy was used to describe the types of errors reported. SETTING Practices in Canada, Australia, England, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United States. PARTICIPANTS Family physicians in the six countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Types of errors reported. Differences in errors reported in different countries. RESULTS In Canada, 15 family doctors reported 95 errors. In the other five countries, 64 doctors reported 413 errors. Although the absence of a denominator made it impossible to calculate rates of errors, Canadian doctors and doctors from the other countries reported similar proportions of errors arising from health system dysfunction and gaps in knowledge or skills. All countries reported similar proportions of laboratory and prescribing errors. Canadian doctors reported harm to patients from 39.3% of errors; other countries reported harm from 29.3% of errors. Canadian physicians considered errors “very serious” in 5.8% of instances; other countries thought them very serious in 7.1% of instances. Hospital admissions and death were among the consequences of errors reported in other countries, but these consequences were not reported in Canada. CONCLUSION Serious errors occur in family practice and affect patients in similar ways in Canada and other countries. Validated studies that analyze errors and record error rates are needed to better understand ways of improving patient safety in family practice. EDITOR’S KEY POINTS • “To err is human” and physicians are no different from other people in this respect. Despite their potential for harming patients, there is little information about medical errors in family practice. • The Linneas Collaboration was formed in 2001 to study medical errors in primary care. Family doctors from Canada and five other countries were asked to report errors they thought should not happen again. • The three most common categories of errors reported in Canada were process errors (office administration, filing systems, chart problems), investigation errors, and treatment errors. Proportions of errors in Canada were similar to those in other countries. Most errors occurred in family physicians’ offices. Print short, web long Research Abstracts This article has been peer reviewed. Full text available in English at www.cfpc.ca/cfp Can Fam Physician 2005;51:386-387.