J Oral Maxillofac Surg
65:1865-1868, 2007
Arterial Stents for Access and Protection
of the Parotid and Submandibular Ducts
During Sialoendoscopy
Maria Papadaki, DMD, MD,* Leonard Kaban, DMD, MD,†
Christopher Kwolek, MD,‡ David Keith, DMD, FDSRCS, BDS,§
and Maria Troulis, DDS, MSc
Sialoendoscopy has recently gained popularity as a
minimally invasive alternative to ablative surgery for
obstructive salivary duct disease resulting from stones
and strictures. Sialoendoscopy has been performed in
numerous patients with a high degree of success.
1-3
However, damage or perforation of the duct during
repeated manipulation of the endoscope and surgical
instruments is a known complication.
1-3
This can re-
sult in a false passage that may compromise the suc-
cess of the procedure. The purpose of this study was
to assess the feasibility of using cardiovascular stents
to dilate and maintain access to the parotid and sub-
mandibular ducts during sialoendoscopy. The hypoth-
esis was that stents would allow for easy instrumen-
tation of the ducts with fewer traumatic injuries. To
the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on
the use of cardiovascular stents for this purpose.
Materials and Methods
Sialoendoscopy was performed on 10 Yorkshire pig
cadaver heads. The parotid (n = 20) and submandib-
ular (n = 20) ducts were identified and dilated using
salivary gland dilators (Karl Storz GmbH & Co, Tut-
tlingen, Germany). The submandibular and parotid
gland ducts in Yorkshire pigs are 4 to 6 cm long and
1.5 to 2 mm in diameter, similar dimensions to the
corresponding human ducts.
4
In the experimental group, 10 parotid and 10 sub-
mandibular ducts, a 28-mm-long Cypher coronary
stent (Cordis Corp, Miami Lakes, FL) was inserted into
each duct (Fig 1). The balloon was inflated with a
pressure pump to achieve 12 atm of pressure, which
expanded the stent to a diameter of 3.5 mm (Fig 2).
The balloon was then removed, and the stent was
sutured in place to maintain the diameter, reinforce
the duct, and maintain access (Figs 3, 4). In the
control group of 10 parotid and 10 submandibular
ducts, the endoscope was used without duct stenting
(Fig 5).
A Nahlieli Storz endoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen,
Germany) was used to navigate the duct system in
both groups. This is a semirigid endoscope, 1 mm in
diameter, with a 2.3-mm sheath for interventional
endoscopy. The sheath has 3 channels: 1 for the
scope, 1 for irrigation, and 1 for working instruments
(Fig 5). Navigation of the ducts in both the experi-
mental and control groups was repeated 5 times to
replicate the clinical scenario of repeated instrumen-
tation.
The experimental technique was evaluated for ease
of use, surgical time (in minutes), and duct injury. To
evaluate duct injury, the total length of duct (5 cm)
was harvested, dissected longitudinally, and photo-
graphed under 5 magnification. A blinded evaluator
scored the harvested ducts according to the following
grading system: score 0, no damage, normal lining;
score 1, fewer than 2 tears, less than 1 mm long; score
Received from the Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
and General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
*AO-ASIF/Synthes Fellow in Pediatric Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery.
†Walter C. Guralnick Professor and Chairman, Department of
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
‡Assistant Professor, Division of Vascular and Endovascular
Surgery.
§Clinical Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery.
Associate Professor, Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery Pro-
gram, Director of Residency Program, Department of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery.
This study was presented in part at the 87th AAOMS meeting in
Boston, MA, 2005. This study was funded in part by the Massachu-
setts General Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Education and Research Fund, the AO-ASIF/Synthes Fellowship in
Pediatric Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and the Hanson Founda-
tion, NIH K23.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Troulis:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts Gen-
eral Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114; e-mail: mtroulis@
partners.org
© 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
0278-2391/07/6509-0036$32.00/0
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.041
1865