ORIGINAL
CONTRIBUTION
Results, Outcome Predictors,
and Complications after Stapled
Transanal Rectal Resection
for Obstructed Defecation
Giuseppe Gagliardi, M.D.,
1
Mario Pescatori, M.D., F.R.C.S., E.B.S.Q.,
2
Donato F. Altomare, M.D.,
3
Gian Andrea Binda, M.D.,
4
Corrado Bottini, M.D.,
5
Giuseppe Dodi, M.D.,
6
Vincenzino Filingeri, M.D.,
7
Giovanni Milito, M.D.,
8
Marcella Rinaldi, M.D.,
3
Giovanni Romano, M.D.,
9
Liana Spazzafumo, M.S.,
10
Mario Trompetto, M.D.
11
on behalf of the Italian
Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery (SICCR)
1 General Surgery, Clinica Pineta Grande, Caserta, Italy
2 Coloproctology Unit, Villa Flaminia Hospital, Rome, Italy
3 Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit,
University of Bari, Bari, Italy
4 Coloproctology Unit, Ospedale Galliera, Genoa, Italy
5 Coloproctology Unit, Ospedale S. Antonio Abate, Gallarate, Varese, Italy
6 Coloproctology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
7 General Surgery, Ospedale S. Eugenio, Rome, Italy
8 Coloproctology Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
9 Coloproctology Unit, Ospedale Moscati, Avellino, Italy
10 Center of Biometric and Medical Statistics INRCA - Ancona, Ancona, Italy
11 Coloproctology Unit, Clinica S. Gaudenzio, Novara, Italy
PURPOSE: Obstructed defecation may be treated by stapled
transanal rectal resection, but different complications and
recurrence rates have been reported. The present study was
designed to evaluate stapled transanal rectal resection results,
outcome predictive factors, and nature of complications.
METHODS: Clinical and functional data of 123 patients
were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had symptoms
of obstructed defecation before surgery and had rectocele
and/or intussusception. Of them, 85 were operated on by
the authors and 38 were referred after stapled transanal
rectal resection had been performed elsewhere.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 17 (range, 3–44)
months, 65 percent of the patients operated on by the
authors had subjective improvement. Recurrent rectocele
was present in 29 percent and recurrent intussusception
was present in 28 percent of patients. At univariate
analysis, results were worse in those with preoperative
digitation (P <0.01), puborectalis dyssynergia (P <0.05),
enterocele (P <0.05), larger size rectocele (P <0.05), lower
bowel frequency (P <0.05), and sense of incomplete
evacuation (P <0.05). Bleeding was the most common
perioperative complication occurring in 12 percent of
cases. Reoperations were needed in 16 patients
(19 percent): 9 for recurrent disease. In the 38 patients
referred after stapled transanal rectal resection, the most
common problems were perineal pain (53 percent),
constipation with recurrent rectocele and/or intussuscep-
tion (50 percent), and incontinence (28 percent). Of these
patients, 14 (37 percent) underwent reoperations: 7 for
recurrence. Three patients presented with a rectovaginal
fistula. One other patient died for necrotizing pelvic
fasciitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Stapled transanal rectal resection achieved
acceptable results at the cost of a high reoperation rate.
Patients with puborectalis dyssynergia and lower bowel
frequency may do worse because surgery does not address
the causes of their constipation. Patients with large
rectoceles, enteroceles, digitation, and a sense of incom-
plete evacuation may have more advanced pelvic floor
disease for which stapled transanal rectal resection, which
simply removes redundant tissue, may not be adequate.
This, together with the complications observed in patients
referred after stapled transanal rectal resection, suggests
that this procedure should be performed by colorectal
surgeons and in carefully selected patients.
KEY WORDS: Transanal surgery; Outlet obstruction;
Intussusception; Rectocele; Pelvic floor disease;
Stapled transanal rectal resection; STARR.
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal
Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 3 to 7 2006.
Reprints are not available.
Address of correspondence: Giuseppe Gagliardi, M.D., General Surgery,
Clinica Pineta Grande, Via Domiziana Km. 30, Castel Volturno
(Caserta) 81030, Italy. E-mail: gagliarg@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9096-0
VOLUME 51: 186–195 (2008)
©THE ASCRS. 2007 186