Fluoride additive in epoxide-initiated sol–gel
synthesis enables thin-film applications of SnO
2
aerogels†
Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena,‡
*
ab
David A. Kriz,‡
c
Marcus Giotto,
d
Steven L. Suib
cd
and Alexander G. Agrios
*
ab
Aerogels of SnO
2
were synthesized by an epoxide-initiated sol–gel method. Using ammonium fluoride in
the precursor solution allowed for tunability of the aerogel morphology while no change in the
conductivity was measured. In particular, aerogel shrinkage was decreased dramatically by the addition
of the fluoride precursor. Unfluorinated aerogels showed severe shrinkage of 43% volume change upon
supercritical drying compared to the original alcogel volume. Fluorinated samples exhibited a much less
pronounced shrinkage at 7%. Multiple characterization methods converged to reveal the mechanism by
which fluoride enables the morphological tunability. These findings enable the casting of SnO
2
aerogels
as thin films (which in the absence of fluoride these crack and delaminate due to shrinkage), opening
potential uses in many optoelectronic devices including solar cells.
Introduction
Sol–gel chemistry has become widely used for the synthesis of
metal oxide nanoparticles that are cross-linked into a gel, and
used ultimately either as a dry gel or a powder. Epoxides have
been proven to be effective at initiating the formation of the gel
by acting as mild proton scavengers, maintaining an elevated
pH to promote hydrolysis of metal precursors. While the
hydrated metal is deprotonated, it is linked with other hydrated
metals via olation and oxolation to form metal oxide particles.
1,2
This facile sol–gel process has been widely used in metal oxide
nanoparticle synthesis
2,3
due to its ease of preparation and
relatively low cost of the metal salt precursors.
Tin oxide (SnO
2
) is an n-doped, wide bandgap (3.6 eV at room
temperature) semiconductor widely used in solar cells,
4–6
water
splitting,
7
optoelectronic devices,
8
gas sensors,
9
and transparent
conducting oxides (TCOs).
10
Heat treatment of mesoporous tin
oxides is required for improving conductivity or crystallinity.
11–15
Heating SnO
2
materials made by the epoxide-initiated sol–gel
method induces undesirable morphological features, in
particular, shrinkage resulting in cracking and, in the case of
lms, delamination.
16,17
The morphology of nanostructures is
known to affect critical material properties and has become
a key component in the synthesis of nanoparticulate mate-
rials.
18,19
In order to take full advantage of such materials one
must be able to manipulate the pore structure, surface area,
particle size and crystallinity.
Here, we report on the use of uorine to control SnO
2
aerogel
morphology. We prepared SnO
2
alcogels, by the epoxide-
assisted sol–gel process modied by the inclusion of ammo-
nium uoride (NH
4
F), and dried them using supercritical CO
2
to form aerogels. The uoride profoundly affected aerogel
properties such as shrinkage, density, porosity and surface area.
These changes were extensively characterized, and the mecha-
nism that triggers this was unraveled. Critically, uoride allows
the aerogels to be cast as thin lms on glass substrates by
greatly reducing the shrinkage of the gel during supercritical
drying, which in unorinated samples results in cracking and
delamination. Thin-lm aerogels open a wide array of applica-
tions. For example, we have shown that thin-lm SnO
2
aerogels,
when also doped with Sb(V) for electrical conductivity, function
as mesoporous TCOs, which we have used in dye-sensitized
solar cells.
16
Results and discussion
The effect of the precursor F : Sn ratio on gel time and gel
volume change is shown in Table 1. The increase in F : Sn
consistently decreased the gel time from 300 s for unuorinated
samples to 105 s for samples containing a 1 : 1 F : Sn ratio.
Similar trends have been observed in silica sols, which gel faster
a
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
06269, USA. E-mail: agrios@engr.uconn.edu; juan.correa@eplf.ch; Tel: +1 860 486
1350; +41 788 135459
b
Center for Clean Energy Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
06269, USA
c
Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
d
Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269,
USA
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI:
10.1039/c6ra01015f
‡ JPCB and DAK contributed equally to this work.
Cite this: RSC Adv. , 2016, 6, 21326
Received 12th January 2016
Accepted 17th February 2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra01015f
www.rsc.org/advances
21326 | RSC Adv. , 2016, 6, 21326–21331 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
RSC Advances
PAPER
Published on 17 February 2016. Downloaded by ECOLE POLYTECHNIC FED DE LAUSANNE on 19/07/2016 09:40:42.
View Article Online
View Journal | View Issue