43
Review
www.expert-reviews.com ISSN 1478-9450 © 2009 Expert Reviews Ltd 10.1586/14789450.6.1.43
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diag-
nosed cancer in Western countries [1] . The abil-
ity to assess a woman’s risk of developing this
malignancy remains inadequate and the real
key to increasing survival is early diagnosis.
In fact, early detection (through screening
mammography) decreases the mortality of this
multifaceted disease [2] . However, mammo-
graphy misses as much as 40% of BC, and
breast biopsies after abnormal mammograms
confirm cancer in only 20% of cases. Although
tools are available to help predict risk for the
development of BC, validated biomarkers that
are able to more accurately define who is at
greatest risk have not yet been identified (e.g.,
current serum tumor markers are not useful for
the diagnosis of BC) [3] .
It is well known that BC arises from the
epithelial cells lining the ductal–lobular sys-
tem and, therefore, the analysis of the fluid
contained therein may reveal early signs of
precancerous and cancerous transformation [4] .
On this basis, nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) has
been suggested to be the mirror of the meta-
bolic pathways and cellular modifications
occurring in the breast microenvironment,
both in physiological and pathological condi-
tions [5,6] . Since the first evidence, dating back
to 1958, of the clinical utility of NAF ana-
lysis [7] , ever-growing numbers of studies have
demonstrated and/or confirmed that NAF is
a potential source of biomarkers for the early
diagnosis or risk assessment of BC [8,9] . It has
been recognized that the adult nonpregnant
and nonlactating breast secretes fluid into
the breast ductal system; except during lacta-
tion and in the galactorrhea associated with
endocrinopathies, the nipple ducts are tightly
occluded by keratin plugs, and secretions from
the nipple only rarely escape [10] . Initial stud-
ies with NAF focused mainly on correlating
epithelial cell cytology with BC risk since these
are the cells most at risk for transformation
to BC [11,12] . More recent studies have begun
Ferdinando Mannello
†
,
Virginia Medda and
Gaetana A Tonti
†
Author for correspondence
Department of Biomolecular
Sciences, Section of Clinical
Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences
and Technologies, University
Carlo Bo, Via O. Ubaldini 7,
61029 Urbino (PU), Italy
Tel.: +39 072 235 1479
Fax: +39 072 232 2370
ferdinando.mannello@uniurb.it
Protein and proteomic high-throughput technologies provide the polypeptide signatures of
nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), a breast secretion collected noninvasively from healthy individuals
and cancer patients. As breast cancer develops from ductal–lobular epithelium, the analysis of
NAF (mirroring the ductal–lobular microenvironment) is a useful tool for the analysis of metabolic
pathways within the mammary gland, deepening our knowledge of the biomolecular mechanisms
of breast cancer initiation and progression. The different protein expression of major NAF
proteins, separated using 1D polyacrylamide gels, has proven valuable for the early detection
of women with increased risk of cancer. The failure to recognize a single marker with sufficient
clinical sensitivity and/or specificity has driven the identification of breast cancer multiple proteins
by 2D electrophoresis. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic approaches (SELDI- and MALDI-TOF
technologies) have allowed the characterization of differential NAF proteomic fingerprints
between healthy individuals and breast cancer patients. The intraductal approach of protein
and proteomic analyses may provide a panel of biomarkers to strengthen the armory against
breast cancer.
KEYWORDS:breastcancer•diagnosis•nippleaspirateluid•prognosis•protein•proteinase•proteomics
•tumormarker
Protein profile analysis of the
breast microenvironment to
differentiate healthy women
from breast cancer patients
Expert Rev. Proteomics 6(1), 43–60 (2009)
For reprint orders, please contact reprints@expert-reviews.com