Effect of the Germanium Incorporation in the Synthesis of EU-1, ITQ-13, ITQ-22, and
ITQ-24 Zeolites
German Sastre, Angeles Pulido, Rafael Castan ˜ eda, and Avelino Corma*
Instituto de Tecnologia Quimica. UPV-CSIC, AV/Los Naranjos s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
ReceiVed: December 12, 2003; In Final Form: April 20, 2004
Computational chemistry is used here to rationalize zeolite nucleation and crystallization by means of atomistic
molecular mechanic techniques. It is shown that, by isomorphous substitution of Ge by Si, the relative rate
of crystallization can be reversed in a series of zeolite structures that compete to nucleate and grow under
certain synthesis conditions. This is demonstrated for EU-1, ITQ-13, ITQ-22, and ITQ-24 structures.
1. Introduction
Organic structure directing agents (SDAs) are commonly used
in the synthesis of zeolites to achieve the crystallization of new
structures.
1,2
SDAs are important in the nucleation and growth
of zeolites, but very seldom do they act as real templates of a
particular structure.
3
Indeed, other synthesis variables, such as
temperature, water/silica ratio, the presence (or absence) of
alkaline cations, the silica mobilizing anion (OH
-
or F
-
), and
the nature of framework cations (such as Ge, among others),
can be determinant for the particular structure obtained.
4-11
It
is then not surprising that, using the same SDA but different
alkaline cations (Na
+
,K
+
), two different structuressSSZ-31
and SSZ-24shave been obtained.
12
Also, with N-benzyl-
quinuclidine, either or SSZ-42 are crystallized when the
framework T
III
cation is either Al or B.
13
Unfortunately, it
becomes difficult in most cases to explain the determinant role
that variables other than the SDA can play to direct into several
close structures. In a very interesting paper, Harris and Zones
14
showed the nature of the interactions between the zeolite
microcavity and the SDA, and they related the strength of this
interaction, mostly of van der Waals type, with the crystallization
time of nonasil and SSZ-13 zeolites.
In the present study, we have used hexamethonium as the
SDA, which, under the experimental conditions tested, is able
to produce EU-1, ITQ-13, ITQ-22, and ITQ-24 zeolites. We
study first the pure silica structures and then the effect of
germanium and fluorine incorporation, and then how the
selectivity of the synthesis is influenced by the short- and long-
range interactions of the SDA with the zeolite structure.
Moreover, and using the same theoretical methodology, we show
that the relative rate of crystallization can be practically reversed
when the silica mobilizing agent and the zeolite framework
composition is changed. The theoretical results closely match
those of the preferred zeolite that has been synthesized and their
stability has been measured experimentally.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Preparation of Hexametilen-bis(trimethylammonium)
Dibromide. A quantity of 37.38 g of 1,6-dibromohexane (96%
purity, Aldrich), plus 82.35 g of trimethylamine solution (31-
35 wt % in ethanol), and ethanol in the approximate proportion
to provide a good mixture, were added to a 500 mL flask, and
mixed with a magnetic stirrer for 2 days at ambient temperature.
The mixture then was directly washed with ethyl acetate and
diethyl ether and the product, hexamethonium dibromide, was
recovered using the gravity filtration technique. Afterward, the
white solid obtained was left to dry for 12 h at ambient
temperature and then stored.
2.2. Preparation of Hexamethonium Dihydroxide. Hex-
amethonium dihydroxide was prepared by direct anionic ex-
change using a resin, Amberlite IRN-78 (Supelco), as the
hydroxide source; the resin was washed with Milli-Q water
(Millipore) prior to its use until the water pH was 7. The
procedure involved the dissolution of 9 g of hexamethonium
dibromide in 250 g of Milli-Q water. The resulting solution
was placed into contact with the prior-washed resin into an
exchange column, and the flow rate was regulated to obtain an
exchange yield of >95%. The solution of hexamethonium
dihydroxide was collected into a beaker. This solution was
concentrated at 50 °C and kept under vacuum until the hydroxide
concentration was >0.05 mol/kg.
2.3. Synthesis of the Boron-Containing ITQ-24 Material.
GeO
2
(1.437 g) and 0.204 g of boric acid were dissolved in
161 g of a hexamethonium dihydroxide solution (concentration
of 0.256 mol/kg). A quantity (14.311 g) of tetraethylorthosilicate
(TEOS) was added to the resulting solution, and the mixture
was mechanically stirred at 200 rpm, until the hydrolysis of
TEOS had been completed and the ethanol generated was totally
evaporated. The final synthesis gel had the following molar
composition:
where R(OH)
2
is hexamethonium dihydroxide.
The gel was autoclaved at 175 °C for 15 days under con-
tinuous stirring at 60 rpm, and the solid was recovered by fil-
tration, washed with distilled water, and dried at 100 °C
overnight.
2.4. Synthesis of the ITQ-22 Material. GeO
2
(0.7185 g)
were dissolved in 80.5 g of a hexamethonium dihydroxide
solution (concentration of 0.256 mol/kg). TEOS (7.156 g) was
added to the resulting solution, and the mixture was mechani-
cally stirred at 200 rpm, until the hydrolysis of TEOS had been
completed and the ethanol generated was totally evaporated.
The final synthesis gel had the following molar composition:
where, again, R(OH)
2
is hexamethonium dihydroxide.
The gel was autoclaved at 175 °C for 15 days under
continuous stirring at 60 rpm, and the solid was recovered by
filtration, washed with distilled water, and dried at 100 °C
overnight.
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail ad-
dress: acorma@itq.upv.es.
5SiO
2
:1GeO
2
:1.50R(OH)
2
:30H
2
O:0.12B
2
O
3
5SiO
2
:1GeO
2
:1.50R(OH)
2
:30H
2
O
8830 J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 8830-8835
10.1021/jp0378438 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/27/2004