British Journal of Surgery 1998, 85, 1433–1438
Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional
results after primary repair
A. C. POEN*†, R. J. F. FELT-BERSMA*†, R. L. M. STRIJERS‡, G. A. DEKKER§,
M. A. CUESTA† and S. G. M. MEUWISSEN*
Departments of *Gastroenterology, †Surgery, ‡Clinical Neurophysiology and §Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital ‘Vrije
Universiteit’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: Mrs R. J. F. Felt-Bersma, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital ‘Vrije Universiteit’, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Background This study was designed to investigate the long-term clinical and anorectal functional
results after primary repair of a third-degree obstetrical perineal rupture.
Methods One hundred and fifty-six consecutive women who had a primary repair of a third-degree
perineal rupture were sent a questionnaire and asked to undergo anorectal function testing (anal
manometry, anorectal sensitivity, anal endosonography and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency
(PNTML))
Results Some 117 women (75 per cent) responded. Anal incontinence was present in 47 women (40
per cent); however, in most cases only mild symptoms were present. In 40 women additional
anorectal function tests were performed and compared with findings in normal controls. Mean(s.d.)
maximum squeeze pressure (31(15) versus 63(17) mmHg, P 0·001) was decreased and first
sensation to filling of the rectum (88(47) versus 66(33) ml, P = 0·03) and anal mucosal
electrosensitivity (4·7(1·7) versus 2·5(0·8) mA, P = 0·003) were increased compared with values in
normal controls. In 35 women (88 per cent) a sphincter defect was found with anal
endosonography. Factors related to anal incontinence were the presence of a combined anal
sphincter defect (relative risk (RR) 1·7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·1–2·8)) or
subsequent vaginal delivery (RR 1·6 (95 per cent c.i. 1·1–2·5)).
Conclusion Anal incontinence prevails in 40 per cent of women 5 years after primary repair of a
third-degree perineal rupture. The presence of a combined sphincter defect or subsequent vaginal
delivery increase the risk of anal incontinence.
Anal incontinence occurs in approximately 2·2 per cent of
the general Western population, especially in women
1
.
Many women with anal incontinence have a history of one
or more difficult vaginal deliveries. After a third-degree
perineal tear, which involves rupture of the anal
sphincters and occurs in about 0·4–5 per cent of vaginal
deliveries
2–7
, anal incontinence rates from 19–58 per cent
within several months after the rupture
2,4,8–12
to 7–42 per
cent after several years
8,9,11
have been reported. These
complaints can have serious consequences for the social,
psychological and sexual life of those affected. The exact
cause of anal incontinence after third-degree perineal tear
is not clear. Both sphincter rupture and pudendal nerve
damage are considered pathophysiological factors
4,13–15
.
Anal endosonography, which provides clear images of the
anal sphincters, is advocated in the assessment of anal
incontinence
16,17
, as well as other anorectal function tests,
and might help insight to be gained into the
pathophysiology of anal incontinence after third-degree
perineal tear.
The aim of this study was to investigate long-term
clinical and anorectal functional results after primary
repair of a third-degree obstetrical perineal rupture.
Patients and methods
Between 1985 and 1994, 156 women (approximately 1·8 per cent
of all vaginal deliveries
5
) with a mean age of 31 (range 18–43)
years underwent primary repair of a third-degree obstetric
perineal tear (anal sphincter tear) in the authors’ hospital. A
complete third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear was defined
as a rupture of the perineum with total separation of the anal
sphincters, with or without a breach of the anal epithelium
3,4
.
When some fibres of the anal sphincter remained intact, the
third-degree tear was defined as incomplete
3
. All tears were
confirmed and sutured by a staff gynaecologist. The torn ends of
the anal sphincters, which were retracted, were identified and
approximated with interrupted or ‘figure of 8’ sutures of
polyglactin
18
. The vaginal mucosa, perineal muscles and skin
were then repaired as in routine episiotomy. Postoperative
complications included wound infection in four patients and
anovaginal fistula in two. Nineteen women were lost to follow-
up. The remaining 137 women were sent a questionnaire
1–10 years after the anal sphincter tear (mean follow-up
4·7 years), containing questions about anal incontinence, urinary
incontinence, vaginal flatus and dyspareunia. The severity of anal
incontinence was assessed by a 100-mm visual analogue scale
(VAS), the descriptions at each end being ‘no distress’ and
‘distress couldn’t be worse’.
In addition, all women who were sent a questionnaire were
asked to undergo anorectal function tests. The study was
approved by the medical ethics committee.
Anorectal function tests
Anal endosonography. Anal endosonography was performed
with a Diagnostic Ultrasound System (type 3535; Br¨ uel and Kjër,
Naerum, Denmark) with a 7-MHz rotating endoprobe (type
1850, focal range 2–4·5 cm) covered by a water-filled hard
sonolucent cone (diameter 1·7 cm), producing a 360° view of the
anal canal. Serial images of the anal sphincters were obtained
both transvaginally
19
and transanally. Mean internal and external Paper accepted 17 April 1998
© 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd 1433