Antidepressants and the resilience to early-life stress in
inbred mouse strains
Elke Binder
b*
, Karim Malki
a*
, Jose L. Paya-Cano
a
, Cathy Fernandes
a
,
Katherine J. Aitchison
a
, Aleksander A. Mathe ´
c
, Frans Sluyter
a
and Leonard C. Schalkwyk
a
Rationale Selecting an effective treatment for patients
with major depressive disorder is a perpetual problem
for psychiatrists. It is of particular interest to explore the
interaction between genetic predisposition and
environmental factors.
Objectives Mouse inbred strains vary in baseline
performance in depression-related behaviour tests,
which were originally validated as tests of antidepressant
response. Therefore, we investigated interactions between
environmental stress, genotype, and drug response in a
multifactorial behaviour study.
Method Our study design included four inbred mouse
strains (129S1/SvlmJ, C57LB/6J, DBA/2J and FVB/NJ)
of both sexes, two subjected to environmental
manipulations (maternal separation and unpredictable
chronic mild stress) and two representative of treatment
with antidepressants (escitalopram and nortryptiline vs.
vehicle). The mice treated with antidepressants were
further divided into those administered acute (1 day)
and subchronic (14 days) regimes, giving 144 experimental
groups in all, each with at least seven animals. All animals
were tested using the Porsolt forced-swim test (FST) and
the hole-board test.
Results Despite a 24-h maternal separation (MS) or a
14-day unpredictable chronic mild stress protocol, most
animals seemed to be resilient to the stress induced.
One compelling finding is the long-lasting, strain-specific
effect of MS resulting in an increased depression-like
behaviour in the Porsolt FST and elevated anxiety-related
behaviour in the hole-board test seen in 129S1/SvImJ
mice. Nortriptyline was effective in reversing the effect
of MS in the FST in 129S1/SvlmJ male mice.
Conclusion A single 24-h maternal separation of pups
from their mother on postnatal day 9 is a sufficient insult
to result in a depression-like phenotype in adult
129S1/SvImJ mice but not in C57LB/6 J, DBA/2 J,
and FVB/NJ mice. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics
21:779–789 c 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Pharmacogenetics and Genomics 2011, 21:779–789
Keywords: antidepressants, depression, escitalopram, Genome-based
Therapeutic Drugs for Depression, maternal deprivation, maternal
separation, nortriptyline, pharmacogenetics
a
King’s College London, Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre,
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK,
b
INSERM U862, Avenir group Physio-
pathology of Energy Balance and Obesity, Universite ´ de Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux,
France and
c
Karolinska Institutet-Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska University,
Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence to Leonard C. Schalkwyk, PhD, Social, Genetic and
Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Box P082
De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
Tel: +44 0 207 848 0279; fax: +44 0 207 848 0866;
e-mail: Leonard.schalkwyk@kcl.ac.uk
*Elke Binder and Karim Malki have contributed equally to this study.
Received 10 June 2011 Accepted 23 July 2011
Introduction
The most popularly prescribed class of antidepressant
drugs is the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
(SSRI), represented in this study by the drug escitalo-
pram. Individual response to SSRIs is highly hetero-
geneous, with up to half of the treated patients finding no
relief or only partial relief from their symptoms [1].
Moreover, many patients have reported low tolerabil-
ity [2]. Therefore, a variety of alternative antidepressant
drugs can be prescribed in the hope of increasing efficacy
or tolerance. These include second-generation tricyclics,
such as nortriptyline (a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor).
The genetic and environmental etiologies of individual
differences moderating the response and tolerance to
common antidepressant medications remain largely un-
known. It is, therefore, important to investigate the
behavioural differences in drug response in connection
with environmental factors and genetic background. This
will lead to better prediction of drug response and a
reduction in the lag time produced by the current trial-
and-error procedure.
Various attempts have been made to generate animal
models of depression [3]. One strategy is to use selectively
bred lines of rats or mice [4,5] and another is to use proto-
cols such as unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS)
and maternal separation (MS) to induce depression-
related behaviour in healthy animals.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations
appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this
article on the journal’s website (www.pharmacogeneticsandgenomics.com).
Original article 779
1744-6872 c 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32834b3f35
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.