Benjamin J. Fregly
1
Phone: (352) 392-8157
Fax: (352) 392-7303
e-mail: fregly@ufl.edu
Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Department of Othopaedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611
Haseeb A. Rahman
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611
Scott A. Banks
Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611
and The Biomotion Foundation,
West Palm Beach, FL 33480
Theoretical Accuracy of
Model-Based Shape Matching for
Measuring Natural Knee
Kinematics with Single-Plane
Fluoroscopy
Quantification of knee motion under dynamic, in vivo loaded conditions is necessary to
understand how knee kinematics influence joint injury, disease, and rehabilitation.
Though recent studies have measured three-dimensional knee kinematics by matching
geometric bone models to single-plane fluoroscopic images, factors limiting the accuracy
of this approach have not been thoroughly investigated. This study used a three-step
computational approach to evaluate theoretical accuracy limitations due to the shape
matching process alone. First, cortical bone models of the femur, tibia/fibula, and patella
were created from CT data. Next, synthetic (i.e., computer generated) fluoroscopic images
were created by ray tracing the bone models in known poses. Finally, an automated
matching algorithm utilizing edge detection methods was developed to align flat-shaded
bone models to the synthetic images. Accuracy of the recovered pose parameters was
assessed in terms of measurement bias and precision. Under these ideal conditions where
other sources of error were eliminated, tibiofemoral poses were within 2 mm for sagittal
plane translations and 1.5 deg for all rotations while patellofemoral poses were within
2 mm and 3 deg. However, statistically significant bias was found in most relative pose
parameters. Bias disappeared and precision improved by a factor of two when the syn-
thetic images were regenerated using flat shading (i.e., sharp bone edges) instead of ray
tracing (i.e., attenuated bone edges). Analysis of absolute pose parameter errors revealed
that the automated matching algorithm systematically pushed the flat-shaded bone mod-
els too far into the image plane to match the attenuated edges of the synthetic ray-traced
images. These results suggest that biased edge detection is the primary factor limiting the
theoretical accuracy of this single-plane shape matching
procedure. DOI: 10.1115/1.1933949
1 Introduction
Between 1997 and 2002, the number of Americans afflicted
with arthritis more than doubled to 70 million, making arthritis the
new leading cause of work disability 1. According to the Arthri-
tis Foundation, the most common form of arthritis, osteoarthritis
OA, appears in the knee more than any other joint. Disease
development and progression are influenced by abnormal joint
kinematics under dynamic, weight-bearing conditions 2,3.
Therefore, knowledge of kinematics in healthy and arthritic knees
would be extremely valuable for understanding the disease’s eti-
ology and predisposing factors as well as for guiding surgical
planning, technique, and procedure.
Few studies have measured three-dimensional 3D knee kine-
matics under loaded, physiological conditions with submillimeter
accuracy as needed to study arthritis-related issues. Video-based
motion analysis with surface markers has been used widely to
study gross body motion but less to study detailed joint motion
due to the problem of skin and soft tissue motion artifacts 4–10.
Use of redundant surface markers to correct for motion artifacts
shows promise and evaluation of these methods is ongoing 9,10.
However, the most direct way to eliminate these issues is to mea-
sure joint motion using x-ray techniques. For artificial knees,
single-plane fluoroscopy has been used to measure implant motion
directly 11–15. With this approach, 3D computer aided design
CAD models of the metallic components are aligned to each 2D
fluoroscopic image to quantify pose translation and rotation pa-
rameters. This approach works well since the metallic components
have precisely known geometric features and produce sharp edges
in fluoroscopic images. For natural knees, since CAD models of
the bones are not readily available from the manufacturer, biplane
fluoroscopy with implanted bone markers has been used instead
16–18. Though more accurate than single-plane fluoroscopy, this
approach requires surgical implantation of metal beads which re-
stricts its use to research projects with limited populations.
Building on the example of artificial knee studies, researchers
have recently begun to use single-plane fluoroscopy to measure
natural knee motion 19–21. For the shape matching procedure,
implant CAD models are replaced with geometric bone models
created from medical imaging data. However, in fluoroscopic im-
ages, cortical bone edges are less well defined than are metallic
implant edges 16. Consequently, to evaluate the extent to which
this approach can be used to study arthritis-related issues, a theo-
retical accuracy assessment is needed to quantify expected errors
in measured joint relative and bone absolute kinematics.
This study quantifies relative and absolute accuracy limitations
due to the shape matching process alone when natural knee kine-
matics are measured by aligning flat-shaded, edge detected bone
models to single plane fluoroscopic images. Similar to the ap-
proach used for knee implant components, flat shading is used in
1
Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Bioengineering Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF
BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 5, 2004. Revi-
sion received January 27, 2005. Associate Editor: Marcus G. Pandy.
692 / Vol. 127, AUGUST 2005 Copyright © 2005 by ASME Transactions of the ASME