ORIGINAL PAPER Chiropractic for neck pain: A pilot study examining whether the duration of the pain affects the clinical outcome Alison Bale * , Dave Newell Equilibria Therapies Limited, 57 Oxford Road, Marlow SL7 2NN, UK Received 20 October 2004; received in revised form 21 June 2005; accepted 30 June 2005 Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal problem in the developed world. Studies suggest a lifetime prevalence of up to 71%, 1 with point prevalence of between 9.5% and 35%. 2—5 The socioeconomic cost of neck pain is consider- able, resulting in substantial consumption of health- care resources, absenteeism from work, disability Clinical Chiropractic (2005) 8, 179—188 intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/clch KEYWORDS Cervicalgia; Cervical spine; Chiropractic manipulation; Chronicity; Neck pain; Pain; Pilot study Abstract Background context: More than 70% of people in the developed world will experience neck pain at some point in their lifetimes. The socioeconomic cost is considerable, as is the human cost to the individuals and their families; however, as yet, there is no agreed treatment protocol. Purpose: To explore whether chronicity affects patient response to chiropractic treatment of neck pain, and how this may impact chiropractic patient management. Method: Pilot cohort study, conducted in a clinic setting, to evaluate patient responses to chiropractic for neck pain. The 21 people who completed the study were divided into two groups depending on the duration of their neck pain (less than 7 weeks and 7 weeks or longer). They were assessed using the Bournemouth Ques- tionnaire for neck pain, which measures outcomes of direct relevance to the individual, such as pain, disability, and perceptions of improvements in quality of life, levels of anxiety and depression. Conclusion: The results demonstrate a positive effect for chiropractic on symptoms of neck pain. The more chronic the presentation, the more treatments were required to achieve asymptomatic status. More acute presentations were perceived as more severe, giving, on average, a higher pre-intervention score. However, the post- intervention scores were, on average, lower. Although the lack of a control group and small sample size limit the generalisations that can be drawn from the results, the overall conclusions may provide important lines of enquiry for future possible study and inform aspects of chiropractic management. # 2005 The College of Chiropractors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1628 472802. E-mail address: alison@equilibria4u.co.uk (A. Bale). 1479-2354/$30.00 # 2005 The College of Chiropractors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.clch.2005.06.006