Clinical Nutrition (2006) 25, 386393 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Post-oesophagectomy early enteral nutrition via a needle catheter jejunostomy: 8-year experience at a specialist unit Aoife M. Ryan à , Suzanne P. Rowley, Laura A. Healy, Philomena M. Flood, Narayanasamy Ravi, John V. Reynolds Department of Clinical Surgery and Nutrition, St. James’s Hospital, Ireland Received 16 August 2005; accepted 8 December 2005 KEYWORDS Enteral feeding; Jejunostomy; Upper gastrointest- inal surgery; Oesophagectomy; Nutritional status; Complications Summary Background & Aims: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate post- operative jejunostomy feeding in terms of nutritional, biochemical, gastrointestinal and mechanical complications in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery for oesophageal malignancy. Methods: The study included 205 consecutive patients who underwent oesophagect- omy for malignancy. All patients had a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) inserted at the conclusion of laparotomy. Patients were followed prospectively to record nutritional intake, type of feed administered, rate progression, tolerance, weight changes and complications either mechanical, biochemical or gastrointestinal. Results: Ninety-two per cent of patients were successfully fed exclusively by NCJ post-oesophagectomy, and 94% of patients were tolerating a maintenance regimen of 2000 ml feed over 20 h by day 2 post-operatively. Patients spent a median of 15 days on jejunostomy feeding post-surgery (range 2112 days); however, 26% required prolonged jejunostomy feeding (420 days). Minor gastrointestinal complications were effectively managed by slowing the rate of infusion, or administering medication. Three (1.4%) serious complications of jejunostomy feeding occurred, all requiring re-laparotomy, one resulting in death. NCJ feeding was extremely effective in preventing severe post-operative weight loss in the majority of oesophagectomy patients post-op. However, oral intake was generally poor at discharge with only 65% of requirements being met orally. Sixteen patients (8%) patients required home jejunostomy feeding. By the first post-operative month, a further 6% (12) patients were recommenced on jejunostomy feeding. ARTICLE IN PRESS http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/clnu 0261-5614/$ - see front matter & 2006 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2005.12.003 à Corresponding author. Tel.: +35314162251; fax: +35314162211. E-mail address: aeryan@stjames.ie (A.M. Ryan).