DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH zyx 39:12-18 (1996) Preclinical Development Toxicology, Formulation Drug Delivery, Pharmacokinetics Venture Capital Enabling Technology Dual Effect of a New Compound, Rupatadine, on Edema Induced by Platelet-Activating Factor and Histamine in Dogs: Comparison With Antihistamines and PAF Antagonists Clinical Development Phases 1-111 Postmarketing Regulatory, Quality, Phase IV Manufacturing Mireia Queralt,' Manuel Merlos,2 Marta Ciral,2 and Anna Puigdemont' * ' zyxwvu Departamento de Farmacologia, Facultad de Veterinaria, Univerridad Aut6noma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 'Laboratorio 1. Uriach & Cia, Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT The antihistamine-H, and antiplatelet activating factor (PAF) activities of seven com- pounds, including rupatadine, a new antiallergic drug, were studied in healthy beagle dogs using a new experimental model that allows simultaneous testing of PAF and histamine reactions in the same animal. The method was based on the measurement of wheal area induced in dogs' skin by intradermal injection of PAF (1.5 zyxwvuts pg) or histamine (2.5 pg). Rupatadine and the HI-antihistamine drugs cetirizine, levocabastine, and loratadine, administered orally at doses of 1 or 10 mg/kg showed similar maximum potencies (7545% of wheal inhibition) 4-8 h after treatment. Levocabas- tine was the longest-acting compound (55% and 69% inhibition 24 h after administration of 1 or 10 mg/kg, respectively). Rupatadine, loratadine, and cetirizine behaved similarly, showing 34% and 58% inhibition at 24 h at the same doses. Dual PAF and histamine antagonist SCH-37370 exhibited mild anti-H, activity, the maximum effect being 27% at zyxwvu 10 mg/kg. Pure PAF antagonists WEB-2086 and SR-27417 showed no effect against histamine-induced wheals. Only rupatadine, SR-27417A, SCH-37370, and WEB-2086 showed PAF antagonist activity, whereas pure antihistamines were in- active. The most potent PAF antagonist was SR-27417A, with a maximum effect of 56% and 80% at 1 and 10 mglkg, respectively. Rupatadine and WEB-2086 antagonized PAF-induced wheal response, although they showed less maximum effect and shorter duration of action than SR-27417A. SCH- 37370 exhibited only slight PAF antagonist activity at 10 mg/kg. Overall, the histamine- and PAF- induced wheal model in dogs proved useful for independent evaluation of histamine and PAF antagonist properties of the tested compounds, as pure antagonists blocked the effect of only one of the mediators. Rupatadine was the only one of the seven compounds studied that showed potent dual activity against PAF and histamine. Drug Dev. Res. 39:12-18 o 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Key words: rupatadine; edema; PAF; histamine INTRODUCTION Contract grant sponsor: Direccion General de lnvestigacion Cientifica y Tecnologia of Spain, contract grant number DGICYT, pB93-0905, H1-receptor antagonists have long been used for the symptomatic relief of allergic and inflammatory diseases such us allergic rhinoconjunc- tivitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria, and asthma gia, Facultad de Veterinaria, U.A.B. Barcelona, Spain. [Aaronson, 1991; Church, 19921. Second-generation *Correspondence to: A. Puigdemont, Dpto de Farmacolo- Received 15 April 1996; accepted 2 August 1996 zy 0 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.