Oxidative Degradation of Polyamide Reverse Osmosis
Membranes: Studies of Molecular Model Compounds and
Selected Membranes
Neil P. Soice,
1
Adrian C. Maladono,
2
Doreen Y. Takigawa,
2
Arlan D. Norman,
1
William B. Krantz,
1
Alan R. Greenberg
1
1
Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering; and the NSF I/U CRC
for Membrane Applied Science and Technology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
2
Koch/Fluid Systems Corporation, 10054 Old Grove Road, San Diego, California 92131
Received 25 February 2002; accepted 20 October 2002
ABSTRACT: Selected aromatic amides were used to
model the chemical reactivity of aromatic polyamides found
in thin-film composite reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Chlorination and possible amide bond cleavage of aromatic
amides upon exposure to aqueous chlorine, which can lead
to membrane failure, were investigated. Correlations are
made of the available chlorine concentration, pH, and expo-
sure time with chemical changes in the model compounds.
From the observed reactivity trends, insights are obtained
into the mechanism of RO membrane performance loss
upon chlorine exposure. Two chemical pathways for degra-
dation are shown, one at constant pH and another that is
pH-history dependent. An alternative strategy is presented
for the design of chlorine-resistant RO membranes, and an
initial performance study of RO membranes incorporating
this strategy is reported. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl
Polym Sci 90: 1173–1184, 2003
Key words: polyamides; reverse osmosis; membranes; chlo-
rination; degradation
INTRODUCTION
Thin-film composite membranes that use aromatic
polyamides as the barrier layer are widely employed
in the purification of water.
1
It is well documented
that the performance of such membranes declines
1,2
[i.e. flux increases and salt rejection drops below re-
verse osmosis (RO) specifications] after exposure to an
oxidizing environment (e.g., 500 –2000 ppmhr of chlo-
rine exposure),
3–7
usually from sodium hypochlorite
that is used to clean the membrane module or found in
residual amounts as a disinfecting agent. Because this
situation raises both basic and practical questions, it
has been of interest to understand the mechanism of
membrane degradation and find ways to increase the
lifetime membrane materials by making them resis-
tant to oxidizing agents.
1
The polyamide membrane degradation effect is
known to be pH dependent
8
; several groups have
studied the mechanism and sought ways to prevent
the degradation.
9 –17
Glater et al.
2
published a review
of previous efforts in 1994. In particular, there are
several cases where insights into a polymer’s chemical
behavior have been generated from model com-
pounds. Lowell et al.
18
found they could predict the
chlorine sensitivity of several types of interfacially
polymerized materials by analyzing the extent of chlo-
rination in analogous model systems. Khanna and
coworkers
19
showed that the mechanism of thermal
decomposition in aromatic polyamides could be de-
termined using amide model compounds. Finally,
Kawaguchi and Tamura
17
reported that two chemical
processes occur in polyamides and amide molecular
model compounds upon chlorine exposure, a revers-
ible N[sbond[H bond chlorination and an irreversible
aromatic ring chlorination (Fig. 1). Some also believe
these two processes precede cleavage of the polymer
chain and interchain crosslinks, most likely at the
amide linkage.
10,16
The previous model compound studies have
sparked efforts to modify the polyamides used as
barrier layers, to increase chlorine resistance. Strate-
gies have involved both the removal of the NOH
functionality and adding electron-withdrawing
groups to the amino aromatic rings. Singh
9
reported
that membranes soaked in nitric acid showed im-
proved chlorine resistance, presumably because of the
addition of nitro groups to aromatic rings in the poly-
amide. These electron-withdrawing groups deactivate
the aromatic ring to electrophilic chlorine addition.
Unfortunately, along with increased chlorine resis-
Correspondence to: A. Norman (arlan.norman@colorado.edu).
Contract grant sponsor: National Science Foundation/
UCRC Center for Membrane Applied Science and Technol-
ogy.
Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 90, 1173–1184 (2003)
© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.