Does salesperson's customer orientation create value in B2B relationships? Empirical
evidence from India
Ramendra Singh
a,
⁎, Abraham Koshy
b,1
a
W-404 New Teaching Block, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, D.H.Road, Joka, Kolkata 700104, India
b
Wing 10, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad 380015, India
abstract article info
Article history:
Received 23 February 2009
Received in revised form 10 February 2010
Accepted 15 April 2010
Available online 8 October 2010
Keywords:
Salesperson
Customer orientation
Value creation
b2b relationships
SOCO
Although value creation in business relationships has taken an important position in the literature, yet scant
attention has been paid to the precise nature of creation or destruction of value in b2b customer-oriented
selling. Moreover, very few empirical studies in the b2b customer value research have focused on emerging
markets, especially the BRIC countries. This study carried out in the context of small and medium sized firms
in India, empirically examines from the SOCO perspective (Saxe and Weitz, 1982), value creation in customer-
oriented selling, and value destruction in sales-oriented strategies. We model value creation, relationship
development, and customer satisfaction as direct and indirect consequences of salesperson's customer
orientation. Based on a sample of 249 small and medium sized Indian firms, we show that salesperson's
customer orientation directly leads to value creation and relationship development with customers. On the
other hand, a sales orientation destroys value, although it may lead to relationship development in the short-
term. We also found that customer satisfaction was unrelated to both types of salesperson's orientations. Our
study has considerable impact for small and medium sized businesses in emerging BRIC markets such as India,
as it throws light on how supplier firms can leverage their salesforce to create value creation with their
customers.
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
The 2003 Goldman Sachs global economics paper, “Dreaming with
BRICs: Path to 2050,” suggests that BRIC countries currently
contribute 13% of global economic output, and are expected to grow
at 8% per annum for the next few years. The report also predicts that
India, being an important BRIC member, could witness its economy
become larger than Japan's by 2032, and become the third largest
economy in the world in next 30 years. Much of the expected
economic growth is likely to be driven by the small and medium
enterprises after the Indian economy is further liberalized.
However, India also presents a cultural milieu that is in contrast to
most developed western societies. Cultural values are also known to
affect the interests, priorities, and strategies used in business
negotiations (Brett, 2000), that eventually impacts an individual's
approach towards exchange relationships (Shi, 2001). India is known
to be a society characterised by a collectivist, high-context, strong
uncertainty-avoidance, and large power-distance culture (Hall, 1976;
Hofstede, 1981). In high context societies, communication between
individuals is characterized by focus on non-verbal cues, more implicit
than explicit (Cohen, 1991), and displaying trust toward people in
ways different from those in low-context cultures (Hsu, 1983). Such
individuals are also more risk averse (Lewicki & Bunker, 1996), which
in turn impacts their economic rationality (Bazerman, 1994), towards
assessing costs and rewards associated with their behaviors (Doney,
Cannon, & Mullen, 1998). In this socio-cultural milieu, exploring the
role of value creation in business relationships becomes important,
since value is considered to be the raison d'etre of collaborative
customer–supplier relationships (Anderson, 1995).
Value creation has been examined at the firm level in the b2b
context in several studies (e.g., Beverland, Farrelly, & Woodhatch,
2004; Eggert, Ulaga, & Schultz, 2006; Flint, Woodruff, & Gardial, 2002;
Lapierre, 2000; Ulaga & Eggert, 2005). However, research on customer
value in business markets is still in an early stage (Flint et al., 2002),
focusing predominantly on the value of the physical product,
neglecting relational dimensions of customer-perceived value
(Dwyer & Tanner, 1999). The popular concept of relationship value
(Payne and Holt, 1999) too focuses on products, delivery, service, and
interactions, as key dimensions (Dorsch, Swanson, & Kelley, 1998;
Eggert & Ulaga, 2002; Gassenheimer, Houston, & Davis, 1998; Möller &
Törrönen, 2003; Ulaga, 2003; Walter, Ritter, & Gemünden, 2001),
ignoring the salesperson's customer-oriented behaviors that may
impact on the value creation. Although a firm's market orientation
consists of market sensing, dissemination, and response, market
sensing as an aspect becomes more important in which salespersons
play a vital role. This study too only includes those aspects of
salesperson's customer orientation (focussed more on market
Industrial Marketing Management 40 (2011) 78–85
⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 33 24678000x552, +91 9998493034.
E-mail addresses: ramendra@iimcal.ac.in, s_ramendra@yahoo.co.in (R. Singh),
akoshy@iimahd.ernet.in (A. Koshy).
1
Tel.: +91 79 66324895; fax: +91 79 66306896.
0019-8501/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.012
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Industrial Marketing Management