Retrotting pool-and-weir shways to improve passage performance of benthic shes: Effect of boulder density and shway discharge José Maria Santos a, *, Paulo Branco a, b , Christos Katopodis c , Teresa Ferreira a , António Pinheiro b a Centro de Estudos Florestais, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa 1349-017, Portugal b Centro de Estudos de Hidrossistemas, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal c Katopodis Ecohydraulics Ltd., 122 Valence Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3T 3W7, Canada A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 27 April 2014 Received in revised form 19 August 2014 Accepted 13 September 2014 Available online xxx Keywords: Technical shways Bottom substrate Upstream passage Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter A B S T R A C T Retrotting, or the addition of features to existing shways to make them more suitable for upstream sh passage, is an issue of increasing interest in shway science. Despite its potential for aiding sh passage, few studies are available on retrotting of pool-and-weir shways by adding boulders at the bottom of each pool of these facilities. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a full-scale retrotted pool-and-weir shway model with boulders placed at the bottom of each pool, to enhance passage of a cyprinid species, the Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei), which was considered as a representative of medium-sized benthic potamodromous cyprinids in Iberia and Western Europe. Particular attention was given to testing the effects of boulder density and shway discharge on passage success and sh transit time, both of which affect sh passage efciency. Although no signicant difference in passage success was detected between boulder spacings (mean proportion for high density: 35% success; mean proportion for low density: 40% success), increased ows (62.7 l/s) induced a higher mean proportion (P < 0.05) of successful negotiations (50%), relative to low ows (38.5 l/s, 25%). With regard to sh transit time, under higher ows, sh took signicantly less time (P < 0.05) to ascend the shway with the higher (5.3 4.2 min) vs the lower boulder density (12.1 6.5 min). This study showed that sh passage success was discharge-related and independent of boulder density. However, a high density boulder conguration combined with higher shway discharge can be benecial as it reduced sh transit time. Such information could be used to retrot ill-functioning shways in order to improve sh passage efciency and negotiation of shways for benthic potamodromous cyprinids. ã 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Pool-and-weir shways are the most common type of sh passage devices worldwide (Hatry et al., 2013; Larinier, 2008; Pompeu et al., 2012). These facilities are predominantly installed at low head barriers built for small-scale hydropower and other water diversion structures and consist of a rectangular ume divided by cross-walls that create a series of consecutive pools arranged in a stepped pattern, with each one higher than the one immediately downstream (Katopodis et al., 2001). These pools divide the obstacle height into smaller steps to be negotiated by sh, which move from one pool to the next through openings in the cross-walls that are situated at the top (notches) and/or at the bottom (submerged orices) (FAO/DVWK, 2002). Despite their worldwide popularity, the performance of these facilities, mea- sured as the proportion of sh successful negotiations with minimum delay, is relatively low in many parts of the world, such as in southern European countries (Santos et al., 2012), because their design was biased by salmonid-based guidelines. Salmonids are typically strong swimmers with great leaping abilities, while the most abundant sh species in southern European countries are potamodromous and resident cyprinids that have weaker swim- ming abilities (Katopodis Ecohydraulics Ltd., 2013). Therefore, incorporating additional provisions for sh passage in pool-and- weir shways could facilitate upstream movement of these species. Retrotting, or adding features to existing shways to make them more suitable for upstream sh passage, is an issue of increasing interest in shway science (Gough et al., 2012). The * Corresponding author. Tel.: +351 213 653 489. E-mail addresses: jmsantos@isa.ulisboa.pt (J.M. Santos), pjbranco@isa.ulisboa.pt (P. Branco), katopodisecohydraulics@live.ca (C. Katopodis), terferreira@isa.ulisboa.pt (T. Ferreira), antonio.pinheiro@tecnico.ulisboa.pt (A. Pinheiro). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.065 0925-8574/ ã 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Ecological Engineering 73 (2014) 335344 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Engineering journal homepage: www.else vie r.com/locat e/e coleng