Middle Jurassic stromatactis mud-mounds in the Pieniny Klippen Belt (Carpathians) A possible clue to the origin of stromatactis R. Aubrecht a, , J. Schlögl a , M. Krobicki b , H. Wierzbowski c , B.A. Matyja d , A. Wierzbowski d a Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina - G, SK-84215 Bratislava, Slovakia b Dept. of Stratigraphy and Regional Geology, University of Mining and Metallurgy, Al. Mickiewicza 30, PL-30-059 Kraków, Poland c Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland d Institute of Geology, University of Warsaw, Al. Żwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warszawa, Poland abstract article info Article history: Received 14 May 2008 Received in revised form 11 November 2008 Accepted 28 November 2008 Keywords: Mud-mounds Stromatactis Siliceous sponges Jurassic Carpathians Four occurrences of Jurassic stromatactis mud-mounds were found in the Czorsztyn Unit of the Pieniny Klippen Belt (Western Carpathians) in western Slovakia (Slavnické Podhorie, Babiná), and in the Transcarpathian Ukraine (Priborzhavskoe and Veliky Kamenets). Their stratigraphic range is from Bajocian to Callovian. The mounds consist of micropeloidal mudstones, wackestones to packstones with a fauna including pelecypods, brachiopods, ammonites and crinoids. Spicules and skeletons of siliceous sponges are abundant in every section. All of the mounds contain networks of stromatactis cavities that are partially lled with radiaxial brous calcite (RFC) and locally by internal sediments. At Slavnické Podhorie, the sparry masses that ll stromatactis cavities are weathered out and show casts of sponges. Parallel study of the weathered casts and their cross-sections in slabs showed that they bear all the signs of stromatactis (relatively at bottoms and digitate upper parts, RFC initial llings and eventual blocky calcite later lling). Almost no original sponge structures were preserved. This strongly supports the possible sponge-related origin for stromatactis cavities. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Stromatactis mud-mounds are typical elements of the Paleozoic subtidal marine facies (Krause et al., 2004). Stromatactis was rst described by Dupont (1881, 1882) and it is still an enigmatic phenomenon. It can be dened as the masses of spar (with partial substitution of internal sediment) which have smooth base, digitate roof, occur in swarms and have reticulate distribution (Bathurst,1982). There is still no agreement in opinions concerning the origin of stromatactis. The suggested origins for stromatactis included internal erosion and reworking of small cavities (e.g. Kukal, 1971; Wallace, 1987; Bridges and Chapman, 1988; Matyszkiewicz, 1993, 1997), dewatering or escape of uids (Heckel, 1972; Desbordes and Maurin, 1974; Bernet-Rollande et al., 1981), neomorphism or recrystallization of the calcareous mud (Black, 1952; Orme and Brown, 1963; Ross et al., 1975), dynamic metamorphism (Logan and Semeniuk, 1976), slumps (Schwarzacher, 1961) and fresh-water karstication (Dunham, 1969). Most recent ideas involve frozen clathrate hydrates in the calcareous mud, after which the stromatactis cavities remained (Krause, 2001) or the cavities are interpreted as a result of sedimentation of stirred polydisperse sediment (Hladil, 2005; Hladil et al., 2006, 2007). Second, biogenic origins for stromatactis have also been suggested. The most widely invoked origin for stromatactis is that they are cavities which remained after decomposition of an unknown soft-bodied organism or by nemorphism of carbonate-secreting organism. The suggested organisms include stromatoporoids (Dupont, 1881, 1882; Lowenstam, 1950; Carozzi and Zadnik, 1959), bryozoans (Textoris and Carozzi, 1964), algae (Philcox, 1963; Textoris, 1966; Coron and Textoris, 1974), stromatolites (Cross and Klosterman, 1981), microbial colonies (Tsien, 1985), and burrowing activity of crustaceans (Shinn, 1968). The organisms which are most frequently mentioned in the stromatactis literature are sponges. The sponge theory was rstly suggested by Bourque and Gignac (1983), followed by Bourque and Boulvain (1993), Neuweiler et al. (2001), Neuweiler and Bernouilli (2005) and Delecat and Reitner (2005). Some authors sugested an opinion that a combination of several processes played role in the onset of stroma- tactis, such as microbial binding of the sediment and excavating of the unbound mud (Bathurst, 1982; Pratt, 1982) or a succession of sponges and microbial colonies (Flajs and Hüssner, 1993; Flajs et al., 1996). Mesozoic stromatactis mud-mounds (including Jurassic) are not common. Neuweiler et al. (2001) ascribed this fact to taphonomy of Mesozoic sponge taxa which was different from those of Paleozoic. The Mesozoic taxa were prone to more rapid decay resulting in common cavity collapse and sediment lling. Neuweiler et al. (2001) introduced special terms used for incompletely developped Sedimentary Geology 213 (2009) 97112 Corresponding author. E-mail address: Aubrecht@fns.uniba.sk (R. Aubrecht). 0037-0738/$ see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.11.007 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Sedimentary Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo