IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 56, NO. 2, APRIL2007 431
Phenomenological Model for Frequency-Related
Dissipation in the Quantized Hall Resistance
Blaise Jeanneret and Frédéric Overney
Abstract—Recently, ac measurements of the quantized Hall
resistance have shown a linear relationship between the deviation
of the Hall resistance from the perfectly quantized value ΔR
H
and the dissipation in the system represented by the longitudinal
resistivity ρ
ac
xx
. In this paper, we present a phenomenological
model based on electrodynamic arguments that model this rela-
tion. The dissipation is due to the displacement current flowing in
the system. All the microscopic features are included in a complex
tensorial dielectric susceptibility which remains to be investigated
if more physical insight in the ac transport properties of the 2-D
electron gas is desired.
Index Terms—AC quantum Hall effect (QHE), AC resistance,
dielectric losses, dissipation, frequency dependence, metrology.
I. I NTRODUCTION
S
INCE 1990, the dc quantum Hall effect (QHE) has been
successfully used as a representation of the unit of re-
sistance: the ohm. The universal nature of transport in a 2-D
electron gas (2DEG) at low temperature and high magnetic
field provides a practical realization of a primary standard of
resistance (see [1] for the latest review). Technical guidelines
have also been written to ensure the highest possible accuracy
in the measurements [2].
The situation for ac measurements of the QHE is not as well
settled, although an important progress has been accomplished
lately [3]. The major problem encountered with the ac mea-
surements is a systematic dependence of the Hall resistance
on current and frequency. These dependencies are related to
losses either within the sample itself or losses due to current
leaking to (or from) the sample’s surroundings. The losses can
be compensated by the use of external gates [4], [5]. From our
point of view, however, it is preferable to remove all the possible
sources of leakage around the sample [5]. This approach leads
to a strong reduction of the losses and allows the study of the
physical processes taking place in the QHE device itself. In
such a configuration, it was recently shown (see Fig. 1) that
the deviation of the Hall resistance R
H
from its perfectly quan-
tized value was proportional to the dissipation in the sample
represented by the longitudinal ac resistivity ρ
ac
xx
[3], [6]
ΔR
H
= s
′
ρ
ac
xx
(1)
where s
′
is the proportionality factor. A linear relationship was
already observed some 20 years ago for dc measurements [7],
Manuscript received July 11, 2006; revised October 27, 2006.
The authors are with the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology (METAS), 3003
Bern-Wabern, Switzerland (e-mail: blaise.jeanneret@metas.ch).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TIM.2007.891162
Fig. 1. Relative deviation of the Hall resistance R
H
, measured at the center of
the i =2 plateau, plotted as a function of ρxx/R
H
for a GaAs/AlGaAs sample
at a temperature of 0.3 K. The current was varied between 10 and 100 μA for
each frequency range. A linear fit to the data gives a slope of s
′
=1.6.
where this behavior was related to variable range hopping and
thermal activation. However, at audio frequencies, additional
physical mechanisms give rise to the dissipation of a different
nature. By introducing a complex tensorial electric suscepti-
bility, the linear relation of (1) can be deduced. Unfortunately,
the calculation of the ac susceptibility is clearly beyond the
scope of such a phenomenological approach.
II. MODEL
At dc, the sheet current density
-→
J and the electric field
- →
E
are related by the conductivity tensor σ. The conductivity σ and
resistivity ρ =(σ)
-1
tensors have their usual form
σ =
σ
xx
σ
xy
-σ
xy
σ
xx
(2)
ρ =
1
σ
2
xx
+ σ
2
xy
σ
xx
-σ
xy
σ
xy
σ
xx
. (3)
Under full quantization, ρ
xy
= σ
-1
xy
= R
H
= R
K
/i and
ρ
xx
= σ
xx
=0, where i is the Hall plateau index and
R
K
≡ h/e
2
.
At finite frequencies, one must take the displacement field
- →
D
into account
- →
J (t)= σ
-→
E (t)+ d
∂
-→
D (t)
∂t
. (4)
The last term in (4) represents the sheet density of the
displacement current
-→
J
D
. The coefficient d is the thickness of
0018-9456/$25.00 © 2007 IEEE