Journal of Chromatography B, 871 (2008) 191–201
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Chromatography B
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chromb
Standardizing GC–MS metabolomics
Harin Kanani
a,1
, Panagiotis K. Chrysanthopoulos
b,c
, Maria I. Klapa
a,b,∗
a
Metabolic Engineering and Systems Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, MD 20742, USA
b
Metabolic Engineering and Systems Biology Laboratory, Institute of Chemical Engineering and High-Temperature Chemical Processes,
Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Patras GR-265 04, Greece
c
Division of Genetics and Cell and Developmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Patras, Patras GR-265 00, Greece
article info
Article history:
Received 18 February 2008
Accepted 30 April 2008
Available online 21 May 2008
Keywords:
Quantitative systems biology
High-throughput “omic” techniques
Data correction and normalization
Data validation
Derivatization biases
TMS-derivatives
Methoximation
Metabolite extraction
abstract
Metabolomics being the most recently introduced “omic” analytical platform is currently at its develop-
ment phase. For the metabolomics to be broadly deployed to biological and clinical research and practice,
issues regarding data validation and reproducibility need to be resolved. Gas chromatography–mass spec-
trometry (GC–MS) will remain integral part of the metabolomics laboratory. In this paper, the sources of
biases in GC–MS metabolomics are discussed and experimental evidence for their occurrence and impact
on the final results is provided. When available, methods to correct or account for these biases are pre-
sented towards the standardization of a systematic methodology for quantitative GC–MS metabolomics.
© 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The post-genomic era is characterized by two major shifts in the
way problems in life sciences are now approached. The first refers
to what is known as the “high-throughput” revolution triggered
by the development of the “omic” technical platforms that allow
for the simultaneous measurement of hundreds to thousands of
molecular quantities. Thus, rather than examining a small number
of genes and/or reactions at any one time, the focus shifts to the
analysis of gene expression and protein activity in the context of
networks and systems of interacting genes and gene products [1].
The second major shift in biological research concerns the impor-
tance that has been attributed to quantitative biology. It is indeed
essential to know the structure of a particular gene-, protein- or
metabolic-network. However, this alone is insufficient to describe
This paper is part of a special volume entitled “Hyphenated Techniques for Global
Metabolite Profiling”, guest edited by Georgios Theodoridis and Ian D. Wilson.
∗
Corresponding author at: Metabolic Engineering and Systems Biology Labora-
tory, Institute of Chemical Engineering and High-Temperature Chemical Processes,
Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Patras GR-265 04, Greece.
Tel.: +30 2610 965249; fax: +30 2610 965223.
E-mail address: mklapa@iceht.forth.gr (M.I. Klapa).
1
Present address: Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., IA 50131, USA.
how the in vivo state of the cellular function(s) that is(are) described
from this network changes depending on the physiological con-
ditions and/or the biological system. Quantitative analysis of the
molecular quantities that define the activity of this network, e.g.
gene expression, protein concentration, protein activity, metabo-
lite concentration or metabolic flux, is required. Based primarily on
these two major shifts, the post-genomic was granted as the era
of the quantitative systems biology revolution. To succeed in the
challenge of quantitative systems biology, major issues concerning
the quantification capabilities of the high-throughput molecular
analysis techniques for each level of cellular function need to be
resolved. They range from limitations in the available experimen-
tal protocols to lack of data analysis techniques for upgrading the
information content of the acquired measurements.
Metabolomics is the most recently introduced [2,3], but cur-
rently one of the fastest growing, high-throughput molecular
analysis platforms. It refers to the simultaneous quantification of
the (relative) concentration of the free small metabolite pools of a
biological system [4]. It provides thus a comprehensive metabolic
fingerprint, correspondent at the metabolic level of the high-
throughput transcriptional and proteomic profiles [2]. Considering
the role of metabolism in the context of the overall cellular
function, it is easily understandable why quantifying a complete
and accurate metabolomic profile is among the major goals of
quantitative systems biology and metabolic pathway engineering.
1570-0232/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.04.049