SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE
Carpal Growth and Function After Pediatric
Transcarpal Hand Replant: Case Report
Greg Merrell, MD, Wendell Heard, MD, Min Jung Park, MD, Paul Ramos, PA, Manuel F. Dasilva, MD
This case discusses the technique, postoperative course, and functional outcomes 5 years
after an amputation between the cartilaginous anlages of the growing carpus in a 7-year-old
boy. The lunate remained attached to the arm, whereas the scaphoid and the remainder of the
carpus were contained within the amputated part. After 5 years, the patient had 94% growth
compared to the other side, a Minnesota dexterity test in the 75th percentile, 0/10 pain,
near-normal sensation, grip strength 17% of the other side, and lateral pinch 79% of the other
side. (J Hand Surg 2008;33A:1354– 1357. Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for
Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
Key words Amputation, transcarpal, pediatric.
A
MORE COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING of the growth
potential and functional recovery in pediatric
limb replantation is needed. There have been
reports on pediatric replantations and the associated
postoperative function and epiphyseal growth, but most
have focused on digital replantations.
1,2
Other reports in
the literature describing outcomes of hand replantations
either do not contain pediatric cases
3–6
or do not stratify
results into those from pediatric versus adult patients,
7,8
or do not list the age of patients.
9
Two case series of
limb replantations in children contain limited functional
outcome data.
10,11
Other reports of pediatric replants
aggregate functional results of wrist-level replants with
more distal metacarpal or digit replants.
12
Another se-
ries with 3 distal forearm or wrist-level replants re-
ported that 2 patients required revision amputations.
13
One report of a successful pediatric distal forearm level
replant contains little information regarding surgical
technique and few details of the functional results.
14
Of the papers discussing specifically hand replanta-
tions in the pediatric population, we were unable to
identify any that discussed the particular challenge and
outcomes of an amputation between the cartilaginous
anlages of the growing carpus. For these reasons, we
present a detailed description of the surgical technique,
rehabilitation, and functional results after replantation
in a 7-year-old boy of an amputation through the prox-
imal row of the carpus.
CASE REPORT
A 7-year-old right-handed boy presented acutely after
complete amputation of his left hand as a result of a log
splitter accident. Radiographic and physical examina-
tion demonstrated an amputation through the proximal
row of the carpus. There was a small chondral injury to
the proximal scaphoid; however, there was no other
fracture given a path of the force through the skin,
capsule, lunotriquetral (LT), and scapholunate (SL) lig-
aments. This was a perilunate-type transection, leaving
the lunate and a small scaphoid chondral fragment
contained within the proximal stump and the remainder
of the carpus within the amputated segment (Figs. 1 and
2). The cold ischemia time before arrival to the operat-
ing room was 4.5 hours.
The proximal arm and the amputated portion were
debrided of devitalized tissue and all structures were
tagged. A combination of 3 radiocarpal K-wires and an
external fixator were used for stabilization. The scaph-
oid was aligned with its proximal chondral fragment,
From the Indiana Hand Center, Indianapolis, IN; Brown University Department of Orthopaedics, Prov-
idence, RI; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospitals of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
PA; The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Received for publication December 5, 2007; accepted in revised form April 23, 2008.
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the
subject of this article.
Corresponding author: Greg Merrell, MD, Indiana Hand Center, 8501 Harcourt Rd, Indianapolis,
IN 46260; e-mail: gregmerrell@gmail.com.
0363-5023/08/33A08-0014$34.00/0
doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.04.020
1354 © ASSH Published by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.