H
3
=
-j
o
rs
K
E
J'
o
K
E
r D
E
e
jsz
, (A.11)
E
r3
=
j
s
K
E
J '
o
K
E
r D
E
e
jsz
. (A.12)
REFERENCES
1. D. Kajfez and P. Guillon, Dielectric resonators, Artech House, Boston,
1986.
2. C.-C. Chen and L. Peters, Buried unexploded ordnance identification
via complex natural resonances, IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat 45
(1997), 1645–1654.
3. J. Steisel, Ame ´lioration de la de ´tection des mines antipersonel par la
caracte ´risation des configurations de champs e ´lectromagne ´tiques pro-
pres a ` la ge ´ome ´trie du proble `me, Engineering dissertation, Universite ´
Catholique de Louvain, 2002.
4. M. Storme, I. Huynen, and A. Vander Vorst, Characterisation of wet
soils in the 2-18 GHz frequency range, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 21
(1999), 333–335.
© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
MOVING PHASE CENTER ANTENNA
ARRAYS WITH OPTIMIZED STATIC
EXCITATIONS
Shiwen Yang, Yeow Beng Gan, and Anyong Qing
Temasek Laboratories
National University of Singapore
EW2 #03-01, Engineering Drive 3
10 Kent Ridge Crescent
Singapore 119260
Received 11 December 2002
ABSTRACT: The in-band sidelobe levels of a moving phase center
antenna array can be significantly lowered by applying a static excita-
tion amplitude distribution, which is more economical and convenient to
implement than those employing dynamic excitation distribution. This
paper describes a differential evolution algorithm method for determin-
ing the static excitations, via application to a 40-element linear array.
© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 38: 83– 85,
2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.
com). DOI 10.1002/mop.10977
Key words: antenna arrays; moving phase center; differential evolution
1. INTRODUCTION
Ultra-low sidelobe levels (SLLs) in antenna arrays are extremely
difficult to achieve in practice through conventional excitation
amplitude tapering, due to various errors such as systematic errors
and random errors [1]. A time-modulation method [2, 3] was
proposed to realize ultra-low SLLs, by introducing time as the
additional degree of freedom to relax the stringent error-tolerance
requirements in conventional antenna arrays. Subsequently, Lewis
and Evins [4] proposed another technique to reduce the SLLs by
moving the phase center of a phased array antenna to Doppler shift
sidelobe signals, out of the radar receiver’s passband. The phase
center motion was achieved by sequentially controlling the RF
switches in the feed lines of the array elements. One advantage of
the moving phase center array, in comparison to the time-modu-
lated array, is that the speed of the phase center motion is much
faster than that of any target, thus leading to potential applications
in airborne or space-borne radar. However, the excitation ampli-
tude distributions in [4] should be kept dynamically across the
entire array, which apparently was not convenient in practical
implementation. To the authors’ knowledge, no further report on
the work carried out in [4] has been reported since then.
In this paper, a new method to reduce the sidelobe levels within
the passband, based on static excitation amplitude distribution, is
proposed. By using the static excitation amplitude distribution,
only conventional RF attenuators or amplifiers are needed in the
practical implementation. The static excitations are obtained
through a global optimization technique based on the differential
evolution (DE) algorithm [5].
2. METHOD
An N-element linear array of /2 equally spaced isotropic elements
is considered (Fig. 1). In this array, M consecutive elements ( M
N) are sequentially switched (as in [4]), to transmit a rectangular
pulse of width T = 1/ B, with a pulse repetition frequency prf . B
is the radar receiver’s passband, and the “switch-on” time step is
= T/( N - M + 1). The time-dependent array factor is given by
F , t = e
j2f0t
k=1
N
A
k
U
k
t e
jk-1 sin
, (1)
where f
0
is the center frequency, is the angle measured from the
broadside direction, A
k
is the static excitation amplitude of the k
th
element (independent of time), and U
k
is the “switch-on” time for
the k
th
element. The space and frequency responses of the array
factor can be obtained by representing Eq. (1) as a Fourier series
Figure 1 N-element moving phase center linear array with M elements
switched on
Figure 2 Normalized power patterns of the 40-element linear array with
a moving phase center, excited by a static -30-dB SLL Taylor n distri-
bution ( n = 5): — f
0
;--- f
0
+ prf ;
......
f
0
+ 2prf
MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 38, No. 1, July 5 2003 83