Pressure wave propagation in a granular bed
Stephen R. Hostler
*
and Christopher E. Brennen
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
Received 28 February 2005; revised manuscript received 13 July 2005; published 21 September 2005
The transmission of pressure waves in granular materials is complicated by the heterogeneity and nonlin-
earity inherent in these systems. Such waves are propagated through particle contacts primarily along the
“force chains” which carry most of the load in granular materials. These fragile and ephemeral chains coupled
with irregular particle packing lead to the observed heterogeneity. Nonlinearity in these systems is largely the
result of the force-deformation characteristic at particle contacts. Through experiments and simulations, we
study the effects of heterogeneity and nonlinearity on the properties of pressure waves through a granular bed.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031303 PACS numbers: 45.70.-n, 62.30.+d
I. INTRODUCTION
Wave propagation within a granular medium is a compli-
cated process that is important not only in a broad range of
technological and natural contexts but also because of the
potential it has for the interrogation of the state of that me-
dium. While there are circumstances in which the interstitial
fluid plays an important role in the wave propagation see,
for example, the fluidized bed research of Gregor and Rumpf
1, Musmarra et al. 2, and Weir 3 or the shock waves of
Ben-Dor et al. 4 we choose to focus here on the simpler
circumstances of a relatively static bed in which the intersti-
tial fluid plays a negligible role. Rather the wave propagation
involves transmission through the particles and from particle
to particle through the contact points. Experiments on wave
propagation in beds of randomly arranged grains 5 and ma-
trices of specific packings 6 revealed propagation speeds
that, as expected, seemed to scale with the elastic wave speed
in the material of the particles
E / where E is the Young’s
modulus and is the density and showed little dependence
on particle size. The speed did seem to increase somewhat
with the overall constraining pressure or overburden pressure
p. An assumption of Hertzian contacts between the particles
7,8 led Duffy and Mindlin 6 to theorize a speed that in-
creased like p
1/6
. The measurements follow this dependence
at higher pressures but the behavior at lower confining pres-
sures is more like p
1/4
. Goddard put forward two possible
explanations for this stronger dependence at lower pressures:
first, that conical asperities may dominate the interaction be-
tween particles and, second, that the coordination number
the number of contacts would increase as the pressure in-
creased 9. These could explain the p
1/4
dependence at
lower pressures. Makse et al. 10 conducted simulations that
supported the coordination number explanation; the simula-
tions also yielded wave speeds in good agreement with the
experimental measurements. We note that Velický and Caroli
11 proposed another explanation for the p
1/4
dependence
that identifies disorder-induced stress fluctuations as
responsible.
However, any review of the literature will clearly unveil a
disturbingly broad range of measured values for the wave
speed in granular beds particularly at lower pressures and it
is difficult to correlate this range with the material properties
involved. At low pressures the wave speeds range from
50 m/s 12 to 210 m/s 5 to 500 m/s 13 for glass or
sand see Ref. 14 for details. Stresses in a static granular
bed are carried by “force chains,” preferentially stressed
chains of particles that are responsible for the nonisotropic
distribution of stress in a granular material 15,16. Stress
waves are therefore propagated primarily along these force
chains. The complication is that force chains can be altered
as a result of very small perturbations. This heterogeneous
and ephemeral nature of a granular bed is one possible ex-
planation for the above-described discrepancies. It leads to
complicated and often elusive wave propagation characteris-
tics that are the subject of this paper.
Liu and Nagel investigated wave propagation in a bed of
5-mm glass beads using an accelerometer of a size compa-
rable to an individual grain; thus they were detecting the
wave transmitted through a single force chain. Though the
waves seemed to be nondispersive in a general, average
sense, the experiments yielded wave speeds that were highly
susceptible to very small perturbations in the bed. This sug-
gested an extreme fragility in the force chain microstructure;
indeed the stress waves may themselves be altering that
structure and therefore the local wave speed 17. Jia et al.
further addressed these issues and distinguished between
propagation at low frequencies where the wavelength is long
compared with the particle size and waves in several force
chains will retain coherence. In contrast, waves at high fre-
quency where the wavelength is comparable with the particle
size will lack coherence at any detector 13. Later we refer
to this limit of Jia et al. which, according to their analysis,
would occur around 50 kHz for 4-mm glass beads.
The purpose of this paper is to delve further into these
intricate complications of wave propagation in a granular
material, utilizing wave propagation measurements and
simulations in beds of particles of different size and material.
In addition to the wave propagation speed, we also examine
the attenuation which is of considerable technological inter-
est since granular materials are often used for acoustic insu-
lation. There are several mechanisms by which wave energy
is dissipated in a granular medium. Energy is clearly dissi-
*Currently at the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engi-
neering, Case Western Reserve University. Electronic address:
hostler@case.edu
PHYSICAL REVIEW E 72, 031303 2005
1539-3755/2005/723/03130313/$23.00 ©2005 The American Physical Society 031303-1