Association Between Schizophrenia and the Syntaxin
1A Gene
Albert H.C. Wong, Joseph Trakalo, Olga Likhodi, Muneeb Yusuf, Antonio Macedo,
Maria-Helena Azevedo, Tim Klempan, Michele T. Pato, William G. Honer, Carlos N. Pato,
Hubert H.M. Van Tol, and James L. Kennedy
Background: Both microarray and candidate molecule studies have demonstrated that protein and mRNA expression of syntaxin
and other genes involved in synaptic function are altered in the cerebral cortex of patients with schizophrenia.
Methods: Genetic association between polymorphic markers in the syntaxin 1A gene and schizophrenia was assessed in a matched
case-control sample of 192 pairs, and in an independent sample of 238 nuclear families.
Results: In the family-based sample, a significant genetic association was found between schizophrenia and one of the four single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) tested: an intron 7 SNP (transmission disequilibrium test [TDT]
2
= 5.898; df = 1; p = .015,
family-based association test [FBAT] z = 2.280, p = .023). When the results for the TDT and case-control analyses were combined, the
association was stronger (n = 430; z
c
= 2.859; p = .004). Haplotype analysis supported the association with several significant values
that appear to be driven by the intron 7 SNP.
Conclusions: The results should be treated with caution until replicated, but this is the first report of a genetic association between
syntaxin 1A and schizophrenia.
Key Words: Schizophrenia, genetics, syntaxin 1A, synaptic protein,
antipsychotics
S
yntaxin is a protein enriched in presynaptic terminals
(Bennett et al 1992), and together with synaptosome-
associated protein 25 kDa (SNAP-25) and vesicle-associ-
ated membrane protein (VAMP), forms the soluble N-ethylmale-
imide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE)
complex, which is vital for chemical neurotransmission (Sollner
et al 1993). Within presynaptic terminals, syntaxin binds to a host
of other neurotransmitter-associated proteins, including the
gamma aminobutyric acid and norepinephrine (NET) transport-
ers (Quick 2002; Sung et al 2003). Syntaxin-NET binding modu-
lates both the intrinsic activity of the transporter and transporter
trafficking to the plasma membrane surface (Sung et al 2003). In
one of the few studies of physiologic function, syntaxin was
transiently downregulated in rat nucleus accumbens following
administration of lipopolysaccharide (Barr et al 2003).
Independent postmortem studies in schizophrenia provide
evidence of increased syntaxin immunoreactivity in the cingulate
cortex of schizophrenia brains when compared with controls
(Gabriel et al 1997; Honer et al 1997). Syntaxin immunoreactivity
was unchanged in schizophrenia in other brain regions including
frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices (Gabriel et al 1997), as
well as cerebellum (Mukaetova-Ladinska et al 2002). A study of
the temporal cortex in schizophrenia patients showed higher
syntaxin mRNA levels in samples of younger patients when
compared with controls, and a negative correlation of mRNA
levels with age in patient samples but not in controls (Sokolov et
al 2000). These studies suggest a possible role for syntaxin in the
pathogenesis of schizophrenia through disruption of the SNARE
complex, or interference with neurotransmitter trafficking.
We hypothesized that one or more polymorphisms of the
syntaxin 1A gene (STX1A) would demonstrate a genetic association
with schizophrenia, and examined this hypothesis across four
polymorphisms in both case-control and family-based samples.
Methods and Materials
Patient Recruitment and Sample Collection
Subjects for this study were recruited with fully informed
written consent, and in accordance with University of Toronto
and Medical Research Council of Canada guidelines for the
ethical treatment of human subjects. Study approval for the
recruitment of Portuguese subjects was given by the University of
Coimbra Internal Review Board (IRB), and in the United States by
the IRB of the State University of New York, Buffalo. A total of
238 nuclear families consisting of probands with schizophrenia
and at least one first-degree relative were collected from both
mainland Portugal (Coimbra) and the Azores islands (124 fami-
lies), and from hospitals in Toronto, Ontario (114 families). In
addition, 192 case-control pairs were recruited from the Toronto
area. All patients had an independent clinical DSM-III-R/DSM-IV
diagnosis of schizophrenia from their referring psychiatrist
(American Psychiatric Association 1994). In patients from Portu-
gal and the Azores, the diagnosis was confirmed with the
Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (Nurnberger et al 1994).
A Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis was administered
by trained research assistants to each proband from the Toronto
region to confirm a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia. In both
samples, a consensus-based procedure provided the ultimate
decision for the diagnostic classification of the patients. Controls
were screened using the Family Interview for Genetic Studies
(Maxwell 1992) and excluded if there was any personal or family
history of mental illness or alcohol/substance abuse. Patients and
control subjects were matched for age, gender, and self-reported
From the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (AHCW, JT, OL, TK, HHMVT,
JLK), Department of Psychiatry (AHCW, HHMVT, JLK), Department of
Pharmacology (AHCW, MY, HHMVT), and Institute of Medical Science
(AHCW, TK, HHMVT, JLK) Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry (AM, M-HA), Univer-
sity of Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sci-
ences (MTP, CNP), Upstate Medical University, State University of New
York, Syracuse, New York; Research Division (MTP, CNP), Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, Washington D.C.; Centre for Complex Disorders (WGH),
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Address reprint requests to Dr. Albert H.C. Wong, Room 711, Centre for
Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada,
M5T 1R8.
Received May 6, 2003; revised February 18, 2004; accepted March 5, 2004.
BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2004;56:24 –29 0006-3223/04/$30.00
doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.03.008 © 2004 Society of Biological Psychiatry