Intracranial Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning in the Acute Phase
of Head Injury
Marco Gemma, Concezione Tommasino, Marco Cerri, Antonella Giannotti, Barbara Piazzi, and
Tosca Borghi
University of Milano, Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Neurointensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital,
Milano, Italy
Summary: In patients with head injury, endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is a potentially
dangerous procedure, because it can increase intracranial pressure (ICP). The purpose of
this prospective nonrandomized study was to evaluate the impact of ETS on intracranial
dynamics in the acute phase of head injury. Seventeen patients with severe head injury
(Glasgow Coma Score 8, range 4–8), sedated and mechanically ventilated, were
studied during the first week after trauma. Single-pass ETS maneuver (with a 16-French
catheter, negative pressure of 100 mm Hg, and duration of less than 30 seconds) was
performed 60 seconds after the FiO
2
was increased to 100%. After ETS, FiO
2
was
maintained at 100% for another 30 seconds. Before and after ETS, arterial blood gases
and jugular oxygen saturation (S
j
O
2
), ICP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were
measured and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated. A total of 131 ETS
episodes, which consisted of repeated assessment of each patient, were analyzed. Six
patients in 20 cases coughed and/or moved during ETS because of inadequate sedation.
After ETS, ICP increased from 20 ± 12 to 22 ± 13 mm Hg in well-sedated patients and
from 15 ± 9 to 28 ± 9 mm Hg in patients who coughed and/or moved (mean change, 2
± 6 versus 13 ± 6 mm Hg, P <.0001). CPP and S
j
O
2
increased in well-sedated patients
(from 78 ± 16 to 83 ± 19 mm Hg, and from 71 ± 10 to 73 ± 13%, respectively) and
decreased in patients who reacted to ETS (from 79 ± 14 to 72 ± 14 mm Hg and from 69
± 7 to 66 ± 9%, respectively), and the differences were significant (mean change, CPP:
5 ± 14 versus -7 ± 15 mm Hg, P .003; (S
j
O
2
) 2 ± 5 vs. -3 ± 5%, P<.0001). In
well-sedated patients, endotracheal suctioning caused an increase in ICP, CPP, and S
j
O
2
without evidence of ischemia. In contrast, in patients who coughed or moved in response
to suctioning, there was a slight and significant decrease in CPP and S
j
O
2
. In the case of
patients with head injuries who coughed or moved during endotracheal suctioning, we
strongly suggest deepening the level of sedation before completing the procedure to
reduce the risk of adverse effects. Key Words: Endotracheal suctioning—Intracranial
pressure—Cerebral perfusion pressure—Jugular oxygen saturation—Head
injury—Sedation
Endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is a nursing procedure
frequently performed on mechanically ventilated patients
to prevent pulmonary complications. In patients with head
injuries, however, ETS is a potentially dangerous proce-
dure, because it can transiently increase ICP (1–5).
Several modalities have been advocated to reduce sec-
ondary brain damage during endotracheal suctioning (6–
12), and recommendations for ETS in patients with head
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Concezione Tomma-
sino, M.D., University of Milano, Department of Anesthesia, IRCCS San
Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina, 6020132 Milano, Italy. Accepted for
publication May 1, 2001.
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 50–54
© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia
50