pubs.acs.org/Organometallics Published on Web 03/01/2010 r 2010 American Chemical Society Organometallics 2010, 29, 1717–1728 1717 DOI: 10.1021/om9011104 Controlling Selectivity in Intermolecular Alkene or Aldehyde Hydroacylation Reactions Catalyzed by {Rh(L 2 )} þ Fragments Rebekah J. Pawley, † Gemma L. Moxham, ‡ Romaeo Dallanegra, † Adrian B. Chaplin, † Simon K. Brayshaw, ‡ Andrew S. Weller,* ,†,‡ and Michael C. Willis †,‡ † Department of Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QR, U.K., and ‡ Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, U.K. Received December 23, 2009 Rhodium(III) dihydrido complexes [Rh(L 2 )(H) 2 (acetone)][BAr F 4 ] (Ar F =C 6 H 3 (CF 3 ) 2 ) containing the potentially hemilabile ligands L 2 = 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)xanthene (Xantphos) and [Ph 2 P(CH 2 ) 2 ] 2 O (POP 0 ) have been prepared from their corresponding norbornadiene rhodium(I) precur- sors. In solution these complexes are fluxional by proposed acetone dissociation, which can be trapped out by addition of MeCN to form [Rh(L 2 )(H) 2 (NCMe)][BAr F 4 ], which have been crystallographically characterized. Addition of alkene (methyl acrylate) to these complexes results in reduction to a rhodium(I) species and when followed by addition of the aldehyde HCOCH 2 CH 2 SMe affords the new acyl hydrido complexes [Rh(L 2 )(COCH 2 CH 2 SMe)H][BAr F 4 ] in good yield. The solid-state and solution structures show a tight binding of the POP 0 and Xantphos ligands, having a trans-arrangement of the phosphines with the central ether linkage bound. This is similar to the previously reported complex [Rh(DPEphos)- (COCH 2 CH 2 SMe)H][BAr F 4 ] (DPEphos=[Ph 2 P(C 6 H 4 )] 2 O). Unlike the DPEphos complex, the Xantphos and POP 0 ligated complexes are not effective catalysts for the hydroacylation reaction between methyl acrylate and HCOCH 2 CH 2 SMe. This is traced to their inability to dissociate the central ether link in a hemilabile manner to reveal a vacant site necessary for alkene coordination. Consistent with this lack of availability of the vacant site, these complexes also are stable toward reductive decarbonylation. Complexes [Rh(Ph 2 P(CH 2 ) n PPh 2 )(acetone) 2 ][BAr F 4 ](n =2-5) have also been studied as catalysts for the hydro- acylation reaction between methyl acrylate and HCOCH 2 CH 2 SMe at 22 °C. As found previously, for n=2 this affords the product of alkene hydroacylation, but as the chain length is progressively increased to n=5, the reaction also progressively changes to favor the product of aldehyde hydroacylation. This is suggested to occur by a decrease in the accessibility of the metal site on increasing the bite angle of the chelate ligand, so that alkene coordination to a putative Rh(III)-acyl hydrido intermediate is progressively disfavored and aldehyde coordination (followed by hydride transfer) is progressively favored. These, and previous, results show that the overall conversion in the hydroacylation reaction can be controlled by the hemilabile nature of the chelating phosphine in the catalyst (e.g., DPEphos versus Xantphos), and the course of the reaction can also be tuned by changing the bite angle of the phosphine, cf. Ph 2 P(CH 2 ) 2 PPh 2 and Ph 2 P(CH 2 ) 5 PPh 2 . Introduction The transition-metal-catalyzed hydroacylation reaction that couples alkenes, or alkynes, with aldehydes is an attractive atom-efficient method for the formation of unsymmetrical ketones, eq 1. 1,2 It has attracted significant attention in recent years, and a variety of;mainly rhodium-based;catalyst sys- tems have been developed. 3-15 Similar carbonyl hydroacyla- tion systems have also been described. 16-19 The key steps in *Corresponding author. E-mail: andrew.weller@chem.ox.ac.uk. (1) Suggs, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 640–641. (2) Willis, M. C. Chem. Rev. 2009, 110, 725-748. (3) Fairlie, D. P.; Bosnich, B. Organometallics 1988, 7, 946–954. (4) Fairlie, D. P.; Bosnich, B. Organometallics 1988, 7, 936–945. (5) Marder, T. B.; Roe, D. C.; Milstein, D. Organometallics 1988, 7, 1451–1453. (6) Kundu, K.; McCullagh, J. V.; Morehead, A. T., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16042–16043. (7) Jun, C. H.; Jo, E. A.; Park, J. W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1869– 1881. (8) Roy, A. H.; Lenges, C. P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2082–2093. (9) Lenges, C. P.; White, P. S.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6965–6979. (10) Shibata, Y.; Tanaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12552– 12553. (11) Coulter, M. M.; Dornan, P. K.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6932–6933. (12) Osborne, J. D.; Randell-Sly, H. E.; Currie, G. S.; Cowley, A. R.; Willis, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17232–17233. (13) Osborne, J. D.; Willis, M. C. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5025–5027. (14) Willis, M. C.; Randell-Sly, H. E.; Woodward, R. L.; McNally, S. J.; Currie, G. S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5291–5297. (15) Willis, M. C.; McNally, S. J.; Beswick, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 340–343. (16) Bergens, S. H.; Fairlie, D. P.; Bosnich, B. Organometallics 2002, 9, 566–571. (17) Fuji, K.; Morimoto, T.; Tsutsumi, K.; Kakiuchi, K. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3295–3297. (18) Phan, D. H. T.; Kim, B.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15608–15609. (19) Shen, Z.; Dornan, P. K.; Khan, H. A.; Woo, T. K.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1077–1091.